Erich Jarvis teleseminar on "Dancing with Difference: The Heart of Science"

Hi George,

Our concern isn't about getting a nice recording - it's about honoring the schedule and our agreements with guests & members. Dr. Jarvis had made it clear that he could stay until roughly 6:05, and in fact he stayed until 6:15. But I do apologize that the transition from Q&A to Community Hour was awkward in context, and I'll make an effort to make that smoother in the future.

Are there normal or natural Blogway paths to follow? It is going to take some preparation to reply, so I'd like to follow an agreed Blog Path.

About being right or wrong, Filip: not a very useful concept, according to Dr Edward de Bono, another brain -> mind researcher. No concept is 100% wrong, however hard some of our leaders have tried, recently. There is always some grain or kernel of truth present.

So you don't have to give up the "Old ideas from: 'The model of human brain evolution, human development, growth and behaviour that I have learned from Joseph Chilton Pierce' ".

If you map or diagram J C Pierce, then do the same from newer work by Erich Jarvis & his group: on separate papers; on different days to reduce confusion. Compare - and see where they overlap, where they differ.

In place of right and wrong, try different perspectives: like the place in history where these points of view originated. The training of the observers. Usefulness of concepts for various purposes... Imagine an ET viewing the work (Extra-ordinary Terrestrial;-) How might those perspectives differ ? 'Hell, we solved that riddle 25 Bn Yrs ago...)

George
2008 BC

Hi George, I'll wait for more from you about this as I am not quite getting it. You are also bringing new info to the table that I don't have any experience with. You are also giving me more work that I don't want! ;>) Filip