Democratic Transparency in the YouTube Age
What I love about Web 2.0, the new "social media web" in which everyone can be a card-holding publisher and not a silent spectator, is that there are thousands of simultaneous viewpoints on any event or subject. It is with such holographic triangulation, I hope and pray, that greater truth san be resolved out of the mists of chaos, uncertainty, and unfair and unbalanced reporting.
Politicians, as a timely example, are discovering the new political maxim in the Web 2.0 age: "The next stupid thing you say may be on YouTube."
This great NYTimes article examines the new political landscape in which millions of grassroots cameras and instant video publishing are shining new light into the banal and risk-averse world of modern politics.
Some political analysts say that YouTube could force candidates to stop being so artificial, since they know their true personalities will come out anyway. “It will favor a kind of authenticity and directness and honesty that is frankly going to be good,� said Carter Eskew, a media consultant who worked for Senator Lieberman’s primary campaign. “People will say what they really think rather than what they think people want to hear.�
But others see a future where politicians are more vapid and risk averse than ever. Matthew Dowd, a longtime strategist for President Bush who is now a partner in a social networking Internet venture, Hot Soup, looks at the YouTube-ization of politics, and sees the death of spontaneity.
