MONDAY, DECEMBER 1 2008

Heroine Chic- the SHEro's Journey

Channel: Radical Spirit

Heroine Chic- the SHEro's Journey

Renee Zelnick | 09.03.07 | 01:18 PM |
5
(2 ratings)
Renee Zelnick's picture

I wanted a pony for my twelfth birthday. Dad gave me a .22 rifle and an NRA membership.
It has been said (or argued) that there are seven, or eleven comedies and dramas, depending which school of thought you subscribe to. Unless we’re talking about a game of craps or a convenience store, I don’t agree with those numbers. I contend there is but one story-

The Hero’s Journey

I feel it is a mistake however, not to discuss the female hero, or the shero, as I prefer to call her. Let’s give the ladies some equal billing in this cosmic play. From Eden’s Eve to Dorothy in Oz to Ofelia in Pan’s Labyrinth, we gals have answered many Calls to Adventure, Initiation and Return. Writer Ursula la Guin said in “SAGA: Best New Writings on Mythology”:

“It’s sticky, because language is so male-centered that it excludes much of the feminine experience.”

The word "Heroine", is created by the traditional English suffix “ine” transforming the word Hero from the masculine, into the feminine form. It seems somewhat diminutive by definition, and therefore somewhat inappropriate. But when we take look at the “hero”, three letters, h-e-r, spell her, making up seventy-five percent of the word! And if we want to get chromosonal, I’ll point out that we all start out as double xx in the womb.

Don’t get me wrong. These days I consider myself to be more humanist than feminist. And j’adore Joseph Campbell. He made Bill Moyers tolerable. However, no matter how modern the mythmakers, the popular use of language limitations with innate boundaries of gender specific words, bind and constrict us like linguistic lingerie left on as uncomfortably long as this sentence.

Long past the June Cleaver era, women have tossed off the girdle, burned bras, begun wearing the pants and bringing home the bacon. So we could afford new bras. This socially acceptable change in fashion and economy in contemporary culture has moved women beyond the roles of mother, nurse and nun. Entering realms previously dominated by men, we vote, attend university, join the military, explore space, run corporations and/or households. Or we can marry rich in Silicone Valley. It’s easy if you come with your silicones.

As far as style goes, no one really blinks an eye when a woman dresses “masculine”. And it seems acceptable for a guy to wear a dress in an Eddie Murphy/Eddie Izzard/Hasty Pudding/Monty Python/Rocky Horror sort of way (okay- maybe the last one is kinda iffy for some), but beyond that, it is cause for calling a man’s "metrosexual" preference into question. But in actuality, every man has a feminine component in his psyche; and every woman has a masculine component in hers . Carl Jung, biological father of depth psychology, referred to these traits as the anima and animus respectively.

Maybe it’s subconscious fear of the female mysteries that hold society and some men back. Neglect of the inner feminine has had serious cultural consequences resulting in imbalance on both conscious and subconscious levels. HIS-torically
(are you picking up on a pattern here?), while “The Man” has repressed women socially and culturally, attempting to keep them subordinate and powerless he has also suppressed the useful feminine power within himself.

Stephan Larsen points out on page 132 in his book “The Mythic Imagination”, the suppression of women’s natural magic by the male priesthood. Even the very self-actualized Joseph Campbell once remarked to Maureen Murdock, author of “The Heroine’s Journey”:

"But, Maureen, women do not need to go on any journey. They're already in touch with the Feminine."

Yes, Professor Campbell, we are in touch with the feminine. But I promised myself I wouldn’t do that again after college.

We women do seek our animus and a few boons as we cross the threshold into the shero’s journey. A maiden, mother or crone can easily slay a dragon or two.

Especially if she’s well armed.

I guess Joseph Campbell never met Sarah Connor or Lara Croft.

DiscoverDeclareShare

Member Comments:

Submitted by Bob Johnston on September 8, 2007 - 11:45am.

Hi Renee ~

I've always thought Joseph Campbell projected his own male supremecy biases through his interpretation of myth (a kind of thematic apperception test). As you may already know, his views are what Jung called one-pole, two-pole being the way you and I feel and think about the equal importance of anima and animus in all holons.

But that's not why I'm writing. My wife and I were reading the renowned scientist Candace Pert's book Molecules of Emotion the other morning (we take turns reading a few pages most mornings) when up popped some some real interesting stuff. She is writing about opiate receptors, "All receptors are proteins, as I have said. And they cluster in the cellular membrane waiting for the right chemicals keys to swim up to them through the extracellular fluid and to mount them by fitting into their keyholes -- a process known as binding.

"Binding. It's sex on the molecular level!

"And what is this molecular key that docks onto the receptor and causes it to dance and sway? The responsible element is called a "ligand" [sounds close to the Hindu word for phallus, "lingam" -- probably same root]. This is the chemical key that binds to the receptor, entering it like a key in a keyhole, creating a disturbance to tickle the molecule into rearranging its shape until -- click! -- information enters the cell."

Whew! Hot data these scientists come up with there in their white coats and sterile labs! Ain't science fun?

Just thought I'd share our reading with you . . .

You're a wonderful writer . . . keep it comin'!

Bob

P.S. I've seen your website . . . fabulous! Now I feel so inferior I don't want to show you mine ;-)

Submitted by Renee Zelnick on September 8, 2007 - 2:00pm.

wow-

that hit me upside the head -

do it again!

i thought i was bi-polar ( ha-ha!)
u make me feel so jung....

good 2 share your thoughts and sense of humor-

another member read my "Sex & the Siddhi" blog & got a bit judgemental-

I'm going to get on the pert thing as-
i'm reading the laslo book myself ( as well as a slew of other titles-
I'm grad school 4 consciousness studies and research and pointers via U and your blog are most welcome-
Blessings to u and yours!

Submitted by Bob Johnston on September 10, 2007 - 5:13am.

Hi! You, intentionally or not, may have something here . . . maybe suppression of either the anima or animus poles in one's psyche (soul) does spawn bipolar mental illness . . . interesting thought . . . maybe even a hypothesis to test in the course of your grad work somewhere. Whata ya feel-think? Friend, Bob

Submitted by Jeffery DeCelles on September 3, 2007 - 4:08pm.

Now, that's writing, Renee! Having just descended from Animus Mountain, (really), with my beloved Jedidah, I heartily endorse your message, and eagerly anticipate the ongoing emergence of the Heroine Chic in our cultural meme-stream.
In ritual fashion, Jedidah and I exchanged swords this summer, invoking the Sacred Warrior in each other.
Only an ill-formed man fears a well-armed woman.

En Garde!

P.S.- you may be intrigued by the work of John Lamb Lash, whose book, "Not In His Image" was published in Nov. 2006 by Chelsea Green. Some interviews with him are posted as podcasts on www.futureprimitive.org.
He's done some deep scholarship on "Sophianic Wisdom" and the ascendancy of patriarchy, best I've encountered, so far.
Another relevant podcast on that site, found under Gaialogue Archives, is the March-21-2007 interview with Max Dashu, an outstanding scholar specializing in the "supressed history" of women. See her site-www.suppressedhistories.net.
Excellent interviews with Elisabet Sahtouris and Barbara Marx Hubbard are also posted on FuturePrimitive, plus much more.
PAX-JED

Submitted by Renee Zelnick on September 6, 2007 - 8:20pm.

first for your nice comments-

and secondly for the research pointers-

parry one and thrust!

touche'!!!

umm... why do fencing terms look so naughty in print?!

Submitted by Jeffery DeCelles on September 7, 2007 - 4:26am.

Eet eez zee French, mon cheri!

Also, courting behaviors in many mammal species resemble aggression, cats, in particular.

Flash to the incandescently sexy swordfight scene between Antonio Banderas and Catherine Zeta Jones in the first Zorro movie. Whew!

Somebody hand me a towel...

PAX-JED

Share This Page

User login