THURSDAY, JANUARY 8 2009

John K Arnold's Post

John K Arnold's Post

Dog Whisperer, the Mind and How to Think Like a Chef

John K Arnold | 04.13.08 | 07:34 PM |
0
Not yet rated
John K Arnold's picture

In other posts, I have talked about how things come to us how we need to hear them. One of the ways consciousness speaks to me is thru my TV set. Almost magically I will have been asking about something and for some reason I find myself watching a show. It might be a show I watch often or one I have never watched. Now, I see everything as not being what they might immediately appear.

My sister was visiting. She had just got a dog. The dog was not with her. I have never been good with dogs. My mother came out of WWII and her entire experience of dogs was the Nazis using them to attack people. She was terrified of dogs and passed this PTSD on to me as a child.

When my sister came we watched the Dog Whisperer. It did not take long before I was amazed at the simple yet brilliant observation into dogs Cesar has. He had observed and learned from seeing how dogs interact with each other. He related and communicated to them in the dog's way. Dogs responded to him in ways that amazed the people. It seemed most everyone that was having problems with their dog(s) was having it because they were not relating in dog or saw the dog as a person. Things that they did that would be good for relating to people might be very bad in relating to a dog. A dog would be happy in calm submission as it had its place and so felt secure and safe. It was demeaning to the dog but rather kind.

I am not going out and getting a dog. I did jump from this to looking at the relationship I have between I, the observer and I, my mind. This might be leap, but for me it makes sense. Let's play with the idea that my mind is a dog and that the observer consciousness is like the Cesar, the dog whisperer. Let's play with the idea that like a problem dog, my mind can be noisy, complaining, worrying, depressed or otherwise not balanced. Let's play with the idea, that like on the show, the problem is that I am sending out the wrong signals from my I.

One of the things that consistently comes out in the show is the people want Cesar to fix the dog. As he says, he rehabilitates the dog and trains the people. This came to me as an Ah Ha. I have focused on my mind as the issue, just as the people focused on the dog. There intentions were good, but misguided. My mind was not the issue, my I or observer consciousness was. In this revelation, I found immense peace. Just like on the show when the dog stops yapping, biting or other bad behavior almost immediately. My mind did as well. I had the experience of I, walking peacefully leading i, or my mind. It was really that simple.

I had soon after an encounter where I was around someone who was really angry and directing it at me. I saw the situation in the same way. It was their "dog" mind doing this. I now, could see the situation in a way I had never seen it before and I felt no threat, anger or malice towards the person at all. Just like on the show, the person made lots of racket and then came into balance as if by magic.

My wife is a superb chef. She is very talented and creative. We have a large library of cookbooks. We watch lots of cooking shows and particularly like Top Chef. Tom Colicchio, one of the judges has a cookbook out. The difference with his is that almost all cookbooks are recipe books. My wife loved his, as it is not a recipe book. It is how to thinks like a chef. This is a simple concept. If recipes were all that were needed to be a great chef, then computers could be chefs. This came to me and was just what I needed to hear to add to my consciousness. Now, I ask, "How do I think like _____?" when I approach something. This new questions gives new ways of seeing things.

How can I think like an awakened being?

John

DiscoverDeclareShare

Member Comments:

Submitted by Chris Lowe on April 14, 2008 - 5:29pm.

"We move and live and die in the midst of miracles.” Napoleon

I recently distributed a power point via email to some friends. It contained award winning photographs from 2005. The photos depicted various subjects - some indescribably beautiful, others tragic and grotesque, and some of the recipients let me know of their displeasure in receiving the more confronting images. This surprised me because the value of a photographic image to me is its capacity to make you feel something be it joy, sympathy, revulsion. The ability of skilled photographers to impart a message beyond the two dimensional image is where their skill and art lies.

When we feel confronted we are susceptible to profound learning if we are open to it, and I felt this little collection of images had the power to kick open some doors for those I sent them to. Some time later, one of the confronted recipients sent me a power point containing then and now images of aging movie idols which she found funny; I did not. Do we individually take from any given set of stimuli what most need, or what we are ready to assimilate?

I reflect on this in answer to your post because you reminded me that the simplest of circumstances, the smallest of synchronicities has the ability to deliver the insight we seek either knowingly or subconsciously. Learning, knowledge often comes when you least expect it and the truly conscious being seeks it everywhere.

I still find immense power in this little collection of photos. If you would like it email me via this site and I'll forward it; but remember - you asked for it.

Chris

Submitted by Jon Watts on April 13, 2008 - 7:08pm.

-
Hi John,

I too have found a need for either dominance or submission from other people. Once they find out which one they are, their universe is back in order. Like other discussions, this too is a false choice. The third choice is to be. Cocreative, grateful, unified. In the newtonian/mechanistic (or as a friend of mine once called it "Mc Donalds world") things are black and white, good and bad, us and them.

We may not exactly be in the Elysian "Field" just yet, but we can sure see it from here. I'm glad we're looking out over the same view, you and I.

On messages from the TV, any manifestation of creation can be a message. Breaking a pencil, getting a new car, feeling attracted to someone, a dog looking at you, the smell of freshly grown grass, anything. When it has a vivid meaning to you, that's it. Even the most shallow and vapid of encounters can have the deepest meaning.

I'm not surprised that you can see the message, even when it comes from dubious sources. Good eye.

Cheers,

Jon

Submitted by John K Arnold on April 13, 2008 - 8:53pm.

Thanks again for your taking the time to read the post and thoughtfully reply. I feel like I am interacting with a live, real, awakened person. I appreciate that.

In my Dog Whisperer, I understood the dominance and submission part for dogs. In the seeing this as it relates to the mind, I guess I was not clear as I wanted to be. It was a change in perspective from looking at my mind only as the people did when they asked for help with their dogs. The people needed the most help, not the dog. In looking at my mind, I had not considered that the I, or observer, like the people needed to change perspective. I was not even aware of that being possible. Once I opened myself to the possibility that I (observer) could consciously change perspective, everything changed. I hope that makes some better sense.

Everything speaks to me. The trees, the wind, the walls, people, what I read, my own self, what I see, TV and internet are proving to be a good channels for me. It is not my only channel, but I seem to get this one with clear reception at this moment.

Thanks
John

Share This Page

User login