THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 20 2008

Mary Jane Larsen's Post

Mary Jane Larsen's Post

In the Beginning

Mary Jane Larsen | 08.19.08 | 09:24 AM |
5
(1 rating)
Mary Jane Larsen's picture

I thought I would just go ahead and give all of you a real thought twister. Assuming that there is an omniscient, omnificent, omnipotent, omnipresent source and power that people of the world refer to by many names, one of them being God, could this Universe have been created in the following manner? Could such things as Black Holes and force fields and energy fields, and innate creative motion, be explained by studying the "Big Bang" as I have outlined a possible reality in the following postulation? I would like the science buffs to consider the possibilities and have some fun with the concept. No fair stopping when I refer to the Energy as God. For me it makes things easier.

A variety of postulates have come into being as educated and uneducated guesses about the beginning of the universe as we know it. Religionists have been giving their renditions since the question first arose. In their recorded explanations, God, Gods, or Deities, are definitely supposed to have had a great influence with regard to the birthing. Why should I be different in my quest for knowledge? Can you take one more version? If you can, you will like this page. The Bible states, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” We understand the meaning of earth but we still do not know what constitutes the heaven. Is our universe truly the boundless or does it all have a perimeter? God said. “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end.” God is not the “was” or the “will be”, He is the “I AM.

It is my devout belief that all else has a perimeter and a definable nucleus. If this is so, we are able to reason that this universe has a perimeter, even if the finite distinction is the most subtle change in the ratio of gaseous molecules. If this is so, let us refer to the String Theory and The Space-Time Continuum. Many scientists ask the questions, “How big is the universe? Is the universe expanding? How long ago did it come in to being? Was it caused by the “Big Bang?” What was the Big Bang?” In any event they will stick with relative conjectures, as long as the paragraph of explanation doesn’t refer to or include the God, Gods or Deities.

Shall we be brave and use both science and religious accounts, if we want to? Scientists are on the right track. They are working with Space (Mass) Infinity and Time Eternity. They are close to getting it right. They also give the ratio as space (3) and time (1). If we take a look at what could be the answer, we will see that there are four polarities. We operate in three dimensions in this universe and they allow time to assume the fourth dimension. The following is the rationale I would like to take a look at as new information that stems from logic. Beware, all realists and scientists, the question of attitude is about to rear its head above the water. I intend to use the term First Cause.

In the beginning, First Cause was present and was the causation at the birth of this universe. Because of the non-variable within the essence of the First Cause all goals and principles are pursued and supported by the variables. Time and Space were one, (science agrees) Eternity (time) and Infinity (space) appeared as thus: First, draw two circles. One just inside the other. Next, draw two circles, now separating and yet very close to each other. These circles represent time and space. Draw two horizontal figure eights. These represent the compression from spheres to disks of essence. They also represent the two disks as they warped and then twisted into the configuration of figure eights. Now draw a horizontal figure eight and a vertical figure eight that are joining at the gravitational pull at center causing the two forces to begin fusion. The beginning of fusion was immediate when the positioning of the two figure eights became geometric and gravitationally were joined at their centers, causing the four polarities. Changes in the gaseous molecules at the edge of the central fusion caused a perimeter near the center, thereby creating and encapsulating this enhanced universe. All that is within it is in flux and drifts toward the outer edge. Time was split in half and one half was absorbed as space. Thus, we exist with three dimensions of space and time is the fourth potential dimension. Time is self generating, equalizing, and infinite, while space is intrusive, cohesive and eternal. Neither has the properties of the other.

This universe is experiencing and expressing at the exact juncture of the two creative energies. We are the friction of the time space energy. Our universe is expanding as mass and time are being pushed away from the core form of mega-friction. We are a force in flux and we are being projected away from the center polarity by natural gravity. We are in the embryo of forever as individual expression and collective expressionism. We are within the life force of all that is the Word. We are within the “otherness” of First Cause. We are “forever” energy in the “process” of The First Cause. We are spirit in motion. We are not expendable and we are not temporal. We are not the beginning and the end, we are the process. The universe does have a nucleus and a definable perimeter. We are existing within the nucleus. We operate within three dimensions and three spiritual vortexes. We have 10 echelons or dynamic base-level perimeters, 9 spiritual receptor sights within our core, and 26 enhanced perimeters. I don’t think this all happened by chance. In any case, enjoy your participation in solving the mysteries. This is a Thesis seeking an Antithesis or a Synthesis.


Member Comments:

Submitted by Russ Cowgill on August 21, 2008 - 9:09am.

Dear Jane,
I have to tell you that I respect your thoughts but I am unqualified to comment further on your topic. All I can say is that I do hope that somebody who is able to help you with this will give it a go. It bothers me terribly when I am reactive. There has been too much of that recently and I prefer to be supportive. Please accept my sincere apologies.
Russ

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on August 21, 2008 - 10:16am.

I agree about the need to be supportive. It was my calling, my purpose, my occupation (in one form or another) and my intrinsic human nature. It is a natural part of me like breath and life. This blog for me is the trivial pursuit that I have never allowed myself the time or energy to explore.

I have several things on my platter at the present time. By even looking at this blog and reacting in any way you have supported me without even tasting from the bitter cup of my present challenges. I totally accept the love you brought to the table. Love and Light

As always,
Jane

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on August 19, 2008 - 4:05pm.

Unencumbered
Hi Jane,
I'm going to look at this over the weekend. Right now, I have a headache, and I read, "We are aspirin." Of course, you wrote, "We are spirit..."

I have no terminology difficulties, and think this will be interesting to pursue.

Thanks for the challenge.
Blessings,
Barbara

Submitted by Russ Cowgill on August 19, 2008 - 2:40pm.

Dear Jane,
It is said that to try and prove or disprove the existence of God is a fool’s game rendering the verdict simply a matter of one’s faith.

I would be extremely interested to know the source of the rather intriguing vector diagram you laid out verbally. As I plot it there are not one but many possibilities seemingly more in line with my thinking than that there is some absolute being responsible for creation. I am also curious about the one god tradition that only exists in modernity. Which god is it? How but by man’s own doing did this tradition take hold? To my simple mind it seems that man has created god in his own image rather than the other way around. Which religious tradition can rightly lay claim to superiority above all others and if there is an all loving one god then what of those outside that tradition?

I don’t want you to think that I am anti-Christian nothing could be further from accuracy in that I look to the words of Jesus as well as many other teachers and philosophers for understanding. I find more commonality than I do difference and that too suggests there is no superior religious tradition. I am a polytheist not a monotheist. Actually I really don’t think I am a theist at all if that refers to any being that reigns supreme over all others.

Frankly I think the idea that there is one right and all others are wrong is responsible for the horrid state of affairs we humans have perpetrated upon one another regardless of form be it governments, overlords or husbands. They all point to god as the example of how things are to be administered. The four great monotheistic traditions are responsible for millions upon millions of wars and unfathomable carnage over millennia. Some will say “not us but satin is responsible”; I just don’t buy it. As of now science and religion are anathema and that has not changed since science disproved that angels held up the stars and all revolved around the earth. It is not that science has not attempted to act in concert with religion but I suppose being branded heretical and subjected to all manner of tortures has made them a bit gun shy. This stuff still goes on but I have strayed from the topic this has nothing to do with your question about the existence of god but everything to do with man using god to justify his actions.

I don’t think that it is the purpose of science to either prove or disprove god but to discover and seek to understand our universe and the laws that govern it. If anything science has discovered that there may be no absolutes but quite the opposite. What we have understood to be laws are falling one after the other.

This may not be based in the physical sciences but physical sciences are only one aspect of knowledge and taken by itself is no more capable of defining the universe as a whole than is religion.
Russ

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on August 19, 2008 - 3:42pm.

The main plot of the Thesis says in effect that there is First Cause that was present at the beginning. It is OK if I call it the first cause because it does not matter what anyone calls it. Either it is or it isn't. Either there is a uniting factor or energy that makes us all related or there isn't. Either an unexplained energy was the flash-point for the beginning or it wasn't. My real thought twister is concerned with the origin of the big bang. Your other question was, "Who thought up the vector diagram that was laid out?" The answer is "I did."

I really didn't say anything out of line. I just advanced a totally new concept of the big bang. It would explain so many things. The use of the word God has seemed to have struck a nerve that detached you from anything that followed.

I put forth a postulation about a possible look at the creation of this Universe. The original cause of it was in effect the first cause. In other words, the vector diagram is describing where the possible energy came from that has become known as the big bang.

Every religion and philosophy will continue to give names to First Cause and that is what they all fight about. Science is giving new personality tags to each concept of energy. If they name one "God" or "Shiva" or "Great Spirit" it could be the culmination of the true Chaos Theory. We have Electromagnetic Energy, Atomic Energy, etc. We have not just begun to name energies, we have just begun to discover them. Thank you for your gut level reaction. Love and Light,
As Always,
Jane

Submitted by Russ Cowgill on August 19, 2008 - 4:49pm.

The word god did distract me from your question. I’m sure that that has been a problem in many communications that is that some words derail our attempts at understanding. Obviously for me this is one, so I will regroup and pay closer attention to your thesis.

What you have presented and I interpret as a vector diagram complete with time warps is a very interesting patulous. In order to understand it I attempted to plot it on a three dimensional grid. Time being a forth dimension is a bit more complex as the three dimensional representation has to be moved along a continuum in order to be understood graphically. To come to any meaningful conclusions it seems that there are missing pieces, one of which is likely to be my own cognitive powers. Since you are the author of this thesis would you mind explaining how you came up with it.

In order to discuss something I always find it more fulfilling to start from that which is known and can be agreed upon. We are in agreement that there is a First Cause. Perhaps we can agree on other aspects of this as well.

Thanks for putting your own work out for us to consider.
Russ

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on August 19, 2008 - 6:31pm.

I have coined a new hyphenated word since the day on this blog that I had what I term as "an opening". I really don't think it caused me to become special, I just say it has given me permission to speak new words and name new concepts. This new word is "Flash-point" It is a name I have given to the individual original contact with a new concept. This blog is about a Flash-point regarding a possible Big Bang. explanation. I don't claim to even know if it is possible. I haven't read anything that would prove that it is totally impossible.

If you picture the two intersected figure eights that look like a four leaf clover. and the fusion of the Time-Space continuum, it could be a beginning. The force of the fusion would cause any potential that was emitted, to be hurled away from the big bang with enough force to create the Universe. If everything but the first cause has a nucleus and a perimeter, then the possibility of the perimeter of this incredibly vast universe could be simply a slight variation in the form of the gaseous molecules. In other words, there wouldn't have to be a wall or a mass of matter, it could be a wall or a mass of energy. Earth could be so centrally located that as of yet, due to the Light Years of the distance or the inadequacy of equipment and knowledge, scientists can not perceive either the central core or the gaseous molecules of the perimeter.

The variations of time and space could be due to the actual folds and dynamics that would take place in such a configuration, especially if at the time of fusion, portions of Time and Space were disbursed within all four quadrants. I only have the Flash-point. I just wonder if it is a truth and if it were investigated, fitting all the present "knowns" of physics and astrology into the picture, what would the answers reveal.

This was just a concept that came about and hit me with its entirety. If it turns out to be a truth it would have to be validated by some one who could then name the validated theory after himself. I believe this Declare blog site is dotted with Flash-points found as thoughts that prompt others to move beyond the known of man to brave the entrance into the world of "what if?" This blog served as my initiation into this world of exploring possibilities bravely, openly, and respectfully. I look forward to interesting presentations. I invite everyone to dust off your ideas and take another look at them. You may have a Flash-point or your thoughts may spark one in someone else. Love and Light
As always,
Jane

Submitted by Jeffery DeCelles on August 20, 2008 - 7:22pm.

This, Jane, is the Sacred Entango, an improvisation beyond the formal, toward the sublime.

Very little dust remains settled, most blown off in the shockwave of creative impulse.

I love it when that happens.

B.B.

JED

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on August 20, 2008 - 9:32pm.

Unencumbered
I tried to put a U Tube link to Flash Dance, but it didn't work.

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on August 20, 2008 - 8:01pm.

I have a web designer and he is going to make an animated design and I will have the fun of seeing the mystery unfold. I can picture time and space oozing into the patterns. I can also picture Earth in the overlap of time and space. I can picture dark energy as "burned out energy" unable to escape the perimeter. I am going to hear one of the leading astrophysicists speak on the subject of Dark Energy. Dr. Edmomd Bertschinger, is the Chair of the MIT Physics Dept. He will be presenting his research and thoughts about what he calls "The greatest mystery in the Universe"

He says, quote: "By studying distant galaxies and supernovae, and cosmic radiation, astrophysics have discovered a bizarre anti-gravity effect. Something has taken over the cellular machinery of space, forcing it to grow without limit! Perhaps a bizarre substance dubbed dark energy is responsible, or perhaps we fail to understand how gravity works. What is the evidence for this cancer in space? How might it operate? How can we find out?"

He will be speaking at a University that is right across the street from us. I am so blessed with this being put practically in my lap. I was just kicking something around with "The Beginning" but The Sparks Theory has been a real endeavor.

I read on another blog that you have roots in French Canadian Ancestry. Thank you for sharing Love and Light

As always,
Jane

Submitted by Jeffery DeCelles on August 21, 2008 - 6:44am.

This "Cosmological Constant Omega", the X-pansive impulse, intrigues me, too. It frames the wild growth of Human enterprise in humbler context: it ain't all about us, we are embedded in wild growth, just keeping pace, y'know?

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on August 21, 2008 - 9:46am.

I have worked so hard at surviving that I have never had time to explore the realms of science. It is such a pleasure to participate. The Lorenz attractor in the Chaos Theory is a linear, three-dimensional equatable reality that was discovered by Lorenz, a meteorologist, as he plotted weather patterns. Long before I saw material on the Chaos Theory, I had a total vision of time and space becoming chaotic and warping into figure eight configurations and then joining in the center and, because of fusion, producing an atmosphere conducive to evolving anything that could be sustained by, and operate in, three dimensions.

The Lorenz attractor is the set pattern that chaos takes as it resolves form. About three days ago, while looking at the shape of the Chaos pattern I realized it takes the shape of a figure eight. (See Googel and then under Wikipedia's article on The Lorenz attractor you can see the shape.) I thought, if the patterning of Chaos is true, we are a product of the two realities of Time and Space, reduced to highest forms of Chaos, attracted to each other, fusing, and ultimately causing "ultimate chaos" to be subdued.

The only catch to it is that we are caught in the "subduing". Love and Light is definitely in the mix. Humans crave Love and Light. Are Love and Light the ultimate forms of Chaos and are we just now beginning to harness and appreciate their energy? Could this really be the time of Shift from Chaos to order? Oh well, Love and Light,

As always,
Jane

Submitted by Jeffery DeCelles on August 21, 2008 - 12:15pm.

Jane, per Ralph Abraham, I do Not want a shift from Chaos to order. Living things only thrive in a mixture of both, honoring both, dancing with both.
"Are Love And Light the ultimate forms of Chaos...?" I feel they are closer to Energy, and the concept of Chaos is inextricable from Information, i.e., the probability of one thing to occur or another.
My understanding of Chaos, mostly from Ralph, is, it's not "that which by any test is found to be disordered". More like, out of n possible states, one will manifest, but we can't say much about which one.
Your invocation of Lorenz is apt, pattern emerges when data is viewed in a special way. I search for evermore "special ways" including "Tao, The Way".
One of the major dysfunctions of Western Industrial Culture, IMHO, is its acute aversion to Chaos, and the failure to discriminate it from entropic disorder.
That's changing.
You, Jane, are proof.

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on August 21, 2008 - 1:06pm.

The moment the word Chaos was attached to Lorenz's concept, it was considered to be the emerging head of the "spooky other" The word chaos has always denoted some thing that was "out of control". Now they are even changing the connotation of the word. The Chaos Theory actually allows us to see Chaos resolve into a predictable pattern. It seems far out but they are applying the theory to incredibly diverse problems and concepts. Perhaps our understanding of chaos will be the beginning of integrating the "whole". You have great insights and you should have access to "think tanks". Do you blog on other sights? Do you get to really kick things around as they come to you. I mean, are you fulfilled in your creativity? I thank you for addressing the material presented. I hope it has been pleasant, Love and Light,
As always,
Jane

Submitted by Jeffery DeCelles on August 21, 2008 - 7:14pm.

This is my tribe, Jane. I have posted to Reality Sandwich a few times.
I can't honestly say I'm fulfilled in my creativity, but relating to this SIA community has been much more than pleasant!
I trust that opportunities will emerge for greater access in due time, meanwhile, I work 40+ hours/week in manufacturing, and get some biking and hiking in.
Lacking formal schooling presents challenges to recognition of ability. I'm sure you can relate.

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on August 21, 2008 - 9:14pm.

When I married Mr. Larsen about 25 years ago, I was all work and no play. He was an incredible man and his passion was the freedom he felt when riding his motorcycle. If I wanted to share time with him I needed to catch the wave. I journeyed with him to Daytona Florida for "Bike Week" one year and then watched him take many trips to places like Sturges. He always went with our closest friends so I never worried about him while he was on the road. I also spent many wonderful hours on the back of his Honda Aspencade. It was the Autumn of my life and those were intensely wonderful memories.

I always operated in a world of validation and rejection. The two seemed synonymous. I never felt pressure or stress because I never let myself become attached to the outcome. Like the poem by Kipling, that quotes; "If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster, and treat those two impostors just the same." I also received my validation. I really don't care about those things anymore. I have a need to know that I know. I have a need to know, just for myself. I read the last blog that Russ wrote. I had never heard of Greg Braden. I went to Google and found the neat things that he is so expert at. I am like a child in a wonderland of information.

My husband has a PhD and he used it in ways that paid him to explore relative possibilities for the entirety of his professional career. He didn't just "search", he "found". He received his validation and after much scrutiny he even has an "Effect" named after him. He was "expected" to wander into the unknown, armed only with his mind and he used his trained abilities to back him up. I am wandering into the same unknown, with only my mind and then I search for validation in what has already been proven. I sure don't have the lifespan to get the knowledge and then explore the possibilities. Maybe you can relate to what I am saying. It is a wonderful world of possibilities and I am having the same fun as getting on the motorcycle and riding with the wind. (Sorry if I rambled.)

Hopefully when you retire, the opportunities to explore till your heart's content will be your reward for curiosity. Whether it is on your bike or on your computer. Whether it is searching the good Earth or the good Cosmos, the thrill of "being there" is the true fulfillment and it is the essence of the ride. Love and Light

As always,
Jane

Submitted by Russ Cowgill on August 19, 2008 - 9:21am.

I'll take your challenge with the hope that you too will turn your thesis inside out and share your insights with me. I'm sure this will be a most enlightening discussion. As they say "fools rush in" this is a mine field! It's a pleasure getting to know you.
Russ

Submitted by Bob Johnston on August 19, 2008 - 9:12am.

Wow, Jane, you've done it this time. Having been over these and similar questions since theological school back in the 40s and work in the natural sciences beyond that, all I've got to say is that for me it all comes down to and depends on what 'working hypotheses' you want to adopt and build from there.

If you are interested in my results to date please see my SIA blog titled "My Integral Noetic Allegory About Our Origin and Purpose on Earth" http://www.shiftinaction.com/node/2333. Of course, I am open to new research findings from the integral natural sciences and insights drawn from discussions with my soul consultant OM and my experience in the laboratory of life which includes discourse with you and others on SIA.

Happy exploring!

Yours with empathy, understanding, and trust in evidence-based integral natural science and our timeless, omnipresent, caring, mysterious Source of all 'working hypotheses' for consciousness, health, and soul development . . . individually, socially, ecosystemically, and cosmically.

Bob

Submitted by John K Arnold on August 23, 2008 - 5:54pm.

How about if what we experience is one of the infinite number universes and each can have it's own God, so infinite number of Gods. In each universe what would appear would depend on the parameters of the universe. If time was one of the parameters then that universe would have a beginning and end. It spatial dimensions were a parameter of the universe then that universe would have edges. If another universe did not have time as a parameter than those in that universe would not have a beginning or end. Similarly the parameters of spatial dimenson requires edges. Imagine a consciousnes that bubbles up Gods and each gets a recipe to create their universe and off they go. We do not even know the recipe of our own universe and so other universes may be far outside of what can imagine. This allows a God creator concept. I am not a God person but used it here for ease of explanation.

John

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on August 23, 2008 - 9:38pm.

I go even further and I believe we all have a Master Spark within us. I believe it is at the center of our life force and it is known as our "will" Within us we have a separate and unique universe, which we use to create the spiritual atmosphere that is known as our sphere of influence. We are learning all the secrets of our individual universes and now we are beginning to locate the magnitude of the miracle. We are the miracle, all else is secondary. I find when I approach anything it has to be from a place of center, The place of center isn't "out there", it is within me.

Right now I am returning again and again to my center. I am a Malignant Melanoma survivor. Four and a half years ago a small mole on my neck was removed and it was diagnosed as Malignant Melanoma. I had a Dermatologist give me the usual 6 month exam regularly, (for 4 years) About 4 weeks ago I noticed an unusual spot at the same place on my neck. It has actually visibly grown in a month and the earliest appointment I could get is September 2nd. I even went to several Dermatology offices and begged for an earlier appointment. No luck. I don't need to go into all of the ramifications but I am pulling out all the stops within my ability to remain calm and patient. I actually believe that patience is an active aggression that is held in check. So far I am doing pretty good. I am also reaching out for any good thoughts and prayers that can keep me on an even keel. Today I seem to have a new calmness. I picture a first cause and I believe I draw comfort in the hope that I am in some way connected by love to the highest power that could affect my life.

Once in a time of great pain, I actually said to myself. I will become one with love. I felt immediate relief from pain. I have to say this now and in so doing I find relief from fear and dread. So you see, we are creating our universes every minute. Please think good thoughts for me. I am sure it will contribute to my peace of mind. Thank you for giving my heart and mind something very different to process. Love and Light

As always,
Jane

Submitted by John K Arnold on August 24, 2008 - 12:59pm.

I read your note. I am going to say something. I thought about not writing this, but what the heck. How we identify ourself matters and in our universe as you are calling it (I like the analogy), you are God. As God, how are you identifying yourself more importantly is this how you want to identify yourself? I am very respectful of people identifying themself however he or she chooses. I kind of like the I am a God of my universe. Feels good. I am not God of yours and I don't want to be. What I read was "I am a Malignant Melanoma survivor." So, God of your universe is that your identity?

John

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on August 24, 2008 - 2:37pm.

You are using the word God very loosely. You are saying I am referring to myself as God of my universe. Everything that creates is not a god. Because I paint a picture I am not the "Art God" People who create cars in Detroit aren't "Car Gods". My universe is a mere speck in the totality of "what is". I am responsible for its care and its attitudes. No one else can accept or usurp that responsibility. My universe is affected by every other universe and they are affected by mine. I don't especially relish the idea but when I display my attitudes I realize the force in motion that surrounds me. Like all universes there are many planets, bodies of energy and mass, force fields and natural laws that govern the motion within my universe. I try to make myself aware because all within me is flowing in a Divine right order. My universe does not stop at the edge of my skin. It flows beyond what I will ever know or comprehend. I can only marvel at the wonder and privilege of experiencing and expressing from such a panorama.

The "I AM" truly presents an entire universe whose boundaries reside somewhere in the unknown. My energy and known is absolutely different than all the billions of people who ever have lived or ever will live and yet when we manifest outside of our seeming limitations we become a part of all the other universal energies and the "oneness" appears. Your energy is totally unique and expanding. I believe we all have the sanctity of individuality. Any other approach would leave a sense of non-responsibility. I don't ask others to share my belief I didn't just come to this comfort zone lightly. It comes from the realization that thoughts are the means of probing and extending our boundaries and the real means of integral connectedness. We all have the same blood in our veins. This also is our oneness. I have never put this in words before. I am not going to take time to edit or rethink or even revise. At this moment this is how I feel. Love and Light

I am on my way to a picnic and I am taking this universe with its connection to the Divine and its open boundaries for total connectedness out into the cosmos of possibilities. The oneness is waiting. See how easy it is, ha ha

As always,
Jane

Submitted by John K Arnold on August 24, 2008 - 8:51pm.

Hi Jane,

Thanks for the note. I had to think about whether to write my note as I had not interacted here with you before. I thought I might hit a nerve or something. The God word, concepts, beliefs and feelings have lots of charge to them. People live and die for their God(s).

I looked at your sentence about being a cancer survivor and my thought was, my God (there is the God word) I don't know you but I feel really clear that this person, you, are far more than a survivor. If I just took that particular circumstance, I see it as amazing. You have within you the cure for cancer. I don't mean that facetiously. Cancer was there and now it is not. Isn't that an example of cancer cured? Your consciousness or universe put together all the pieces that rid your body of cancer. Your consciousness brought doctors, medicines, treatments and your immune system plus I don't what else and now no cancer. Wow, amazing and real. You did something in the physical world.

I don't use the word or even the idea of God much. It is not my personal way of relating to what appears to me as consciousness. That is just my personal thing. I feel everyone has their own and mine is changing all the time. I hope you enjoyed your picnic. Not editing or revising helps us all.

My best

John

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on August 24, 2008 - 9:48pm.

I have been blessed but this new challenge is catching me at a time of having to once again get all of the facts and try to put my energies in line with my needs and my realities. My husband was notified not long ago that his Medtronics lead wire from his defibrillator to his heart is defective. That was enough to mentally adjust to. Our newest challenge is that when the defibrillator was implanted two years ago, it was set too high and the batteries were spent about three years early. He has to have the defibrillator replaced through surgery on the 28th of August. They won't be replacing the lead wire (to risky) so the delicate wire could cause complications during the procedure.

Mixed in with this my 46 year old daughter is having health problems and she is undergoing test after test. So far they have located an Hiatal Hernia and treatment should proceed after much pain and suffering. She has been helped much by viewing the blogs on this sight and she began meditating and participated in the Grace Light presentation. It has seemed to be very instrumental in getting her through the last few months.

Now to address my particular challenge. I will get all of the facts on September 2nd. When I get the facts I will concentrate on me. I am one of the lucky people who somehow beat the odds. I have always tried to leave every one and every thing better off than when I found them. I believe the universe will treat me the same way. I have never been happier than I am at this moment and I have a husband who feels the same way. Our children all love us and we are surrounded by good thoughts and prayers for our highest good. There is nothing for me that can surpass this precious knowledge. The measure of my success is not enlightenment, it is found simply in "letting love win." Always, whether I am right or wrong, let love win. Love and Light
As always,
Jane

Submitted by Mary Jane Larsen on October 3, 2008 - 12:47pm.

My husband had his heart defibrillator replaced on August 28th. The recalled lead wire came through without a hitch.

My daughter is pulling out of a long session of tests and treatments. She is in good spirits and meditates every day. She is on the mend.

I had the small growth removed and there was a biopsy of the tissue. I am still elated. It was benign.

Sometimes the clouds rain a lot, sometimes they rain a little, and sometimes they pass overhead. What will be will be. love and Light

As always,
Jane

Share This Page

User login