THURSDAY, JANUARY 8 2009

Bob Johnston's Post

Bob Johnston's Post

Which flow do you want to flow with?

Bob Johnston | 08.24.08 | 11:38 AM |
0
Not yet rated
Bob Johnston's picture

Thank you, John for your blog "As Night Into Day - Sleeping Into Awakening - A Seed to Fully Grown Plant
" and Jeffrey for your rejoinder "...Better to go with the flow...". Both of you stimulated me to consider the question, 'Which flow do I want?'

I guess if one identifies with a plant it is whatever flow one perceives the plant to be in.

How about if one identifies with a salmon? 'No way,' says the salmon, 'I'll never get to my happy spawning waters at the top of the rapids' if I float willy nilly like a dead salmon down the river with the flow.'

But human souls are neither (at least last time I checked) plants nor salmon. So what are some options we transtemporal souls operating through temporary human bodies have for defining what the flow is for us? As I see it this is where going with the flow becomes much more complex. Which flow?

Flow can be defined as going with the cycles of our ecosystem. We don't seem to have any choice about that, we are going with the flow of the rotation of our earth and it's cycling around the sun whether we like it or not. But it seems we do have a choice about whether we choose responses to ecosystemic flow with healthful sustainable values and practices or unhealthful ones. So which do you want?

Flow can be defined as going with the prevailing social values and practices. Oh, oh . . . going with the flow of the prevailing social values and practices can get really hairy. Do we want to go with our current societal values and practices which are dirtying our air, contaminating our lovely Gaia, melting our glaciers, etc.? If they are unhealthful for our ecosystem and for me, no I don't want to go with that flow. I try to exert all the influence I can to change the flow in the direction of integrally healthful values and practices for our ecosystem, society, and each of us and our progeny.

Flow can be defined on an individual level as the flow starting from one's biological conception and continuing through birth, maturation, physical decline, and biodeath. While we don't have control over the existence of the flow itself, scientists such as cellular biologist Bruce Lipton (2004) and neuroscientist Candace Pert (1997) show we have far more control over the quality of our individual flow experience for health or ill than previous generations thought possible.

For example, Lipton has shown that we can even change some of our DNA and our health by the way we think and act. Pert has shown we can change the emission of biochemicals in our bodies for health or ill by the way we manage our feelings. My own experience confirms their findings (see SIA blog "Integral Healthful Aging: My Noetic-Based Checklist" http://www.shiftinaction.com/node/3130).

Flow can be defined as the path of one's transtemporal soul development from newborn soul through the present to what many have reported (Newton 2004) as a desire to return to oneness with our timeless conscious Source. My interpretation of that cycle is presented in "Soul Consciousness Expansion: An Integral Noetic Overview http://www.shiftinaction.com/node/3923

So, which definition or definitions do you want? The choice complete with consequence(s) is up to each of us.

As for me, first I want a clear definition of who I am and who I am not before I decide on which flow(s) I want to flow with. I have found the following affirmation most accurately describes who I am and who I am not.

I am an ageless transtemporal soul having a temporal biological life experience. I am not anything temporal. Thus, although one with all temporal beings at the level of our timeless Source of all energy and intelligence, I do not identify in any way with or become attached to temporal plants, fish, and animals, etc. including my own biological body.

I love and respect temporal plants, fish, and animals including my own body, but I am not any of those. I am an ageless transtemporal soul who shares with all other entities -- transtemporal and temporal -- the all-pervading life energy, intelligence, and presence of our Source. That's the realm -- the transtemporal realm -- within which we are all one, just as the water in an ocean is the common realm in which all fish and other plant life are one.

So, what do I do about "going with the flow"? It all depends on the kind of flow . If it doesn't lead to integral health, full functioning, and well being I will reject it and find or create a flow or combination of flows that does.

What are your feelings and thoughts?

Yours with empathy, understanding, and trust in evidence-based integral natural science and our timeless, infinite, omnipresent, caring, mysterious Source of all options for consciousness, healing, and soul development . . . individually, socially, and ecosystemically

Bob

REFERENCES

Lipton, Bruce (2004). The Biology of Belief -- Unleashing the Power of Consciousness, Matter, and Miracles. Mountainoflove Press.

Newton, Michael (2004). The Destiny of Souls. St. Paul, MN: Llewellyn Publications

Pert, Candace (1997). Molecules of Emotion. The Science Behind Mind-Body Medicine. NY: Simon and Schuster.


Member Comments:

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on August 24, 2008 - 4:31pm.

Unencumbered
Hi Folks,
I have been scanning since I don't have much time at the moment. Two things float to mind.

1. "To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven." Ecclesiastes 3:1

2. "Take it easy, take it easy
Don't let the sound of your own wheels
Drive you crazy
Lighten up while you still can
Don't even try to understand
Just find a place to make your stand
And take it easy." (The Eagles)

I am now in big trouble with different people for different reasons.
Have fun with it. Maybe I'll get a chance to look in tomorrow.
Love,
Barbara

Submitted by Bob Johnston on August 25, 2008 - 2:02pm.

Hi Barbara ~ scanning, is that the same as lurking?

Anyhow, it's good to hear you sounding more chipper these days.

Yeh, the anonymous ancient philosopher had something, didn't he? There's a time for ebb and a time for flow . . . ebb and flow . . . ebb and flow . . . hmmm, might make a light rock tune.

Wonder why he didn't want his name attached? Ebb and flow . . .

And those Eagles, great lyrics except for the one about "Don't even try to understand." That's not for me, I love trying to push Sisyphus' rock up the mountain of discovery. Only thing is the more I know, the more I come to realize I don't know.

With empathy and health,

Bob

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on August 25, 2008 - 2:21pm.

Unencumbered
Bob,
I knew you would say something about "Don't even try to understand."
Rightfully so...That part doesn't float my boat. Still, there is a time for everything. In my life the "Don't even try to understand." is a good way to handle paperwork that is basically senseless. So, why try to understand after a point? Just gotta take it easy there, or the sound of my own wheels will drive me crazy. Just tryin' to loosen my load (the Eagles).

Lurking? Nah. Lurking has a dark connotation. Scanning is like skimming. There are clear pedagogical definitions for scanning and skimming. Right now, my brain is malfunctioning (senior blip). It seems that scanning is looking at written material in a global fashion, while skimming involves more reading. I haven't tried lurking...but you never know. Where's a good place to lurk?
Best of Everything,
Barbara

Submitted by John K Arnold on August 24, 2008 - 12:36pm.

Great writing. I often start writing replies and then end up posting them. That is a compliment to the person that posted the blog as it means yours, theirs, his or her blog was stimulating something and opening a new window.

Anyway on this "As for me, first I want a clear definition of who I am and who I am not before I decide on which flow(s) I want to flow with."

What immediately came to mind was the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, where who and what I am is the position and the flow is the direction or movement. You cannot know both at once.

This is my experience. I might for a moment know who or what or I am or as I see how I identify myself. I might be in what we are calling the flow. Once I am aware of being in the flow, I am no longer in it. Identify, flow, identify, flow, breathe in, breathe out, but never at the same moment.

John

Submitted by Bob Johnston on August 24, 2008 - 2:24pm.

Thank you for your response . . . ain't this fun :-)

Well, John, with all due respect to you and Heisenberg, I view his principle as an option for consideration and useful application in other areas of life, such as physics and engineering, but it is not a scientific principle which I have found particularly useful in healthfully and effectively managing my responses to life.

So far during my almost seventy-nine years in this body I have not found Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle as a necessary ingredient for my integral health -- mind-body, social, familial, vocational, economic, and ecosystemic health. I am the most integrally healthy I have ever been (twelve consecutive years of perfect health according to my physician).

And that to me is the bottom line for every belief, value, theory, hypothesis, principle, practice, whatever. If it contributes to my integral health I keep it, if not it's just another option I cannot for all practical purposes use although I support its use by others if it pleases them.

Of course it's for the same reason I choose to have an identity, even though most people view it as a 'nothing identity'. Using the 'working hypothesis' that I am pure, transparent, timeless awareness at one with our non-judgmental Source gives me complete freedom to use all temporal beliefs, values, attitudes, intentions, methods, processes, behaviors, and possessions as options as I see fit for integral health, full functioning, and wellbeing without identifying with and getting all mucked up with any of them.

I can put them on and take them off like different pieces of clothing depending on what the situation at hand calls for. So with all the success I have enjoyed with this non-identity identity :-) I'm sticking with it. What's the old cliche? 'When you're at the ball having a great time dancing with all kinds of folks don't forget who brung ya.'

Any feelings? Thoughts?

Love ya, man . . .

Bob

Submitted by John K Arnold on August 24, 2008 - 5:09pm.

I find it really interesting to see what follows "with all due respect". LOL. It is usually along the lines that what you are saying (meaning what I am saying) sounds good but it is a bunch of crap. LOL This makes me laugh. Thanks.

I am a OK with someone saying things sound like crap to them. I look at the source decide if it is worth acknowledging. I respect you, your thoughts, positions, feelings, ideas and so forth and add it to my library. I can hold positions that appear to conflict. I am not so interested in whether something is right or wrong as whether it is useful. I can take what you write and add it and so it becomes useful to me. I worry about the areas of my life that I am personally bothered by if someone disagrees with me. It triggers in me a look to see why I have a charge on it. I don't have a charge on what I wrote and hey, maybe it is crap. Like I said I look for useful and your post is very useful and for me Heisenberg is useful to me.

BTW; Health is an interesting topic. What we considered to be healthy 30 years ago is not entirely the same as today. There are lot that is the same, and things that have changed quite a bit. What was considered healthy eating has changed by the decade if not in shorter times. How does that relate to your integral health?

Yes, it is fun.

Best

John

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on August 25, 2008 - 2:06pm.

Unencumbered
Hi John,
My husband says, "With all due respect..." To me, it means, "You are full of crap." I hate it. Still, I don't really think it means "You are..." to him. His father was older, probably in the generation of Bob's father even though my husband is 59. It is a genteel way of disagreeing. Come to think of it, if my husband told me I was full of crap, I'd throw something at him.(A time for everything!)
Regards,
Barbara

Submitted by Bob Johnston on August 25, 2008 - 10:44am.

John, we're gonna havta stop meeting like this . . . people will be talkin' :-)

Anyway, with all due respect . . . yup, I use it quite often to just emphasize I do respect an individual and their right to their views even though I may disagree. And I don't privately think of their position as necessarily as "crap". This has been reinforced in my consciousness by one of the Seven Principles espoused by the Unitarian Universalists (they don't have a creed, it's everybody is responsible for their own belief system). The First Principle is to ". . . affirm and promote the inherent worth and dignity of every person." I like that principle and try to do it.

You wrote, "What we considered to be healthy 30 years ago is not entirely the same as today. There are lot that is the same, and things that have changed quite a bit. What was considered healthy eating has changed by the decade if not in shorter times. How does that relate to your integral health?"

Actually it all comes down to what nutrition, exercise, visualizations, etc. is consistently producing integral mind-body health for me. I don't care if it's old data, current, or 'breaking news' type research data. Actually, after doing some very intensive research in 1996-67 into many kinds of lifestyles and then experimenting with what produced the best results as evidenced not only by absence of trips to my physician (last year none)but by blood tests, I selected the practice I've been following religiously since then (about 12 years). If you want more info see my SIA Share Integral Healthful Aging: My Noetic-Based Checklist http://www.shiftinaction.com/node/3130.

Thank you for your interest, John.

Best wishes,

Bob

Submitted by Mary Jane Mohring on August 24, 2008 - 1:17pm.

In ministerial school, our required reading included a wonderful story about the monks in a region whose monastery was next to a river. Some of the monks had been at the monastery for most of their lives. Each year as the new monks were in the process of becoming initiates they were taken to the edge of the rushing river. Teachers, students, young and old leaped into the white foaming waters and floated down the river. Boulders causing obstacles and harsh challenges loomed from the chaos like writhing dragons.

The new initiates would invariably thrash and flail their limbs and scream from the emotion of the wild and uncertain future. The old monks, however, floated listlessly with the current in an almost connectedness with the currents and eddies.

Perhaps we are not always able to chart our exact course, but if I take the wrong one, I know in my heart that sometimes it is good to keep a careful eye on the shore. There always has to be a place to exit the experience. Even the river provides intermittent choices.

Love and Light,
As always,
Jane

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on August 25, 2008 - 2:26pm.

Unencumbered
Jane,
Love that story!
Barbara

Submitted by Bob Johnston on August 25, 2008 - 12:18pm.

Thank you, Jane, for the interesting story. Warmly, Bob

Submitted by Mary Jane Mohring on August 25, 2008 - 12:42pm.

As one story teller to another, I find your stories interesting too. Love and Light'
As always,
Jane

Submitted by Glenn Logan on August 25, 2008 - 3:02am.

This thread is inspiring! Thanks, Bob, John, Barbara, Jeff and Jane (and those whose thoughts and intentions blend with the written word to transmit meaning).
My life has been guided, from one perspective, by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: Certainly nobody could have predicted that the historical facts and influences would have brought me to where I am today (or even that I'd still be alive).
I've been identified as a 'Flow Master' in one book, yet like the monks jumping into the river I know that it is only from one perspective, and that I needed the experience of watching everyone end up downriver, struggle or not, to learn to drift with the flow (which brings me to the finding from psi research attampting to achieve replicability that success generally comes when one quits trying - a finding that I've morphed into: 'You cann ot get there by doing the work, but you have to have done the work to get there!').
I agree wholeheartedly with the idea that Teilhard de Chardin is said to have expressed as 'We are not physical beings having a spiritual experience, we are spiritual beings having a physical experience!', however I do not accept that I'm pure anything: I believe in growth, the pure concept of Karma in which I must find my next level through successive 'lives' (not that I have to atone for past misdeeds), expanding my knowedge as I go (and thus raising the level of the Source (or the zero point field, if one wishes to use the current understanding of quantum physics).
This is my understanding at this point. Maybe in eight years, when I'm 79, my understanding will be different - it probably will be different, in fact.
I do not have a clear picture of what it means to operate in harmony with the different levels of existence: All I do is pray each day that I'll do the right thing, then go into the day bravely assuming that my instinctual reaction to events will be the proper one (trusting in God, is another way of saying this), then at the end of the day review my actions and form the intention to remedy those I might find lacking. I find less and less that I want to change, as time passes.
Maybe, as the salmon whose path upstream is blocked, I am destined to discover another place to spawn, or maybe I'll grow wings and learn to fly to the old place? Perhaps the 'old place' is like the generations of women who cut the end off the roast 'because mom idd it that way', only to find out that great-grandma just did not have a big enough pan, and that's why she cut off the end ...
Off to water aerobics, see y'all tomorrow.

Peace and Love
Glenn

Submitted by Bob Johnston on August 25, 2008 - 1:50pm.

Howdy Glenn,

Thanks for your feedback, comments, and insights. It's always a pleasure to hear from you.

Empathy and Integral Health,

Bob

Share This Page

User login