TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2 2008

Chris Lowe's Post

Chris Lowe's Post

Was the Republican Convention a HBO Production?

Chris Lowe | 09.09.08 | 05:42 AM |
0
Not yet rated
Chris Lowe's picture

I wonder how people are feeling about Sarah Palin? From this remote island it's a little easier to remain objective and absorb the convention's entertainment value - "Deadwood" meets the "West Wing" possibly.

Sarah's speach was very measured and well delivered, (although we were using that Rotweiller joke to describe one of our politicians in the late 90's), but she seems very populist rather than reasoned with her policies aimed squarely at the broadest common denominator. I thought there was some strange body language going on. John seemed a lot keener on Calamity than she on him (not suggesting anything untoward). He seemed all hands, smiles and congratulations and she appeared aloof. Still, having just addressed the convention and the world she may well have been trying to stop her knees knocking.

You may be asking yourself why this bloke is so interested, but I'm sure you followed our recent national election with similar enthusiasm. LOL!

Chris

10 points to the first person who can name the current Australian Prime Minister and deputy PM without having to Google them! 10 Seconds - your time starts now! (I'll give you a clue - Australia is a country).


Member Comments:

Submitted by Ken Ebert on September 15, 2008 - 7:43am.

.
How am I feeling about Sarah Palin? Dude!!!!

Right upfront I hafta point out that she tricked me into a typo (Palin for plain). And then ... and then ... ohhohhohhwowowo ... she made me keep it that way!

Seems that R.A.Wilson was correct: when ya feed people with a steady diet of unadorned lies, then back it up by saying that you are not lying, and how could one be so cruel as to suggest that someone like ME would ever lie, and the whole process, chunked and formed and delivered with ruthless dedication, creates a state of actual functioning psychosis in those subjected to the lies. It creates, as well, as suggested by David Foster Wallace, a level of anxiety, fear, and disconnection that opens one wide to consensual manipulation by the liers. Wallace wrote ....

"“This is dishonest, but what’s sinister is the cumulative effect that such dishonesty has on us: since it offers a perfect facsimile or simulacrum of goodwill without goodwill’s real spirit, it messes with our heads and eventually starts upping our defenses even in cases of genuine smiles and real art and true goodwill. It makes us feel confused and lonely and impotent and angry and scared. It causes despair.”

Funny thing, too, is that in my posting like this someone will likely come along and says that ALL politians do it so what's the big deal.

I'm not dazzled by power, mate. Respect it? Yeah buddy! I also respect craft, and Craft. I think/feel the woman is moi bad news for our country. And I ain't a tad sorry ta say so neither.

~ Ken

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 14, 2008 - 1:47pm.

Unencumbered
It seems, I am sorry three times.
Barbara

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 14, 2008 - 1:51pm.

Unencumbered
Belongs after Bob's post. Signing off. Computer craziness.

Submitted by Jon Watts on September 13, 2008 - 6:24pm.

All,

A friend made a good point at work today. If Sarah gets in, she'll be the kind of advocate we want down in the lower 48, and if she doesn't, we get to keep her. It's a win-win in our book.

I love the latest jab - that she's a native hating bigot. Her husband Todd (aka the First Dude) is Yupik Eskimo. Rich.

Peace all,

Jon

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 10, 2008 - 3:54pm.

Unencumbered
The American presidency changed when Andrew Jackson was elected in 1828. He was a forceful man who vetoed 3 more bills during his presidency than the combined vetoes of 6 presidents who came before him. This was done because he did not like the bills, not because he felt they were unconstitutional. Jackson also implemented the "spoils system" in which he replaced government officials who held lifetime appointments with his own friends. He felt this was more democratic because he claimed to believe in the common man. Andrew Jackson got rid of the National Bank and put the nation's money in "Pet Banks". He did this because he felt the National Bank was for the rich. Nevertheless, this forceful, power welding man, started the idea that the president is the just the average person. The Whigs caught on to the idea of the common man, and even though they were really rich people with Federalist ideals, they presented themselves as average and came into power. Since that time, presidents try to convince the public that they are just like everyday folk. Jackson actually was the common man in some respects. He had been orphaned since the age of 15. Still he held a mixed philosophy of political beliefs. Some were Hamiltonian/Federalist/Loose interpretation of the Constituation, and some of his ideals were Jeffersonian/Anti-federalist/Democratic-Republican/Strict interpretation of the Constitution (That's all one party.)

Since the time of Jackson, people have cast their votes based more on personal appeal/common man then on true political beliefs and platforms.
~Barbara

Submitted by Chris Lowe on September 11, 2008 - 3:34am.

Tend to do the same here Babs - perhaps it's a global thing, part of our conditioning. We all want to think we are voting responsibly and for a government we can trust. It's hard to evenly spread that image across an entire political party so we tend to focus on and vote for the party's leader - their primary roles being to win our trust and give us hope.

Chris

Submitted by Jon Watts on September 10, 2008 - 12:28am.


Well Chris, I expect you knew I would chime in on this one. I have lived in Alaska since 1997. I almost consider myself more Alaskan than American - almost.

First, I must humbly admit that I failed the 10 second test miserably.
There are some heads of state that I keep up with, mostly the notorious. There are literally hundreds of others heading great nations that I do not know. Since I left Europe, I couldn't tell you most of those. So at least Australia shares a space among the greats in my ignorance. Having said that, who knows Alaska or Alaskans? Few. So I'm there with you on that one Bro.

On to Sarah. First I must point out that I am a ©onservative (L)ibertarian. Small "c", capital "L", - ask about that if you want.. Every time I speak on the subject of Sarah with someone left of the middle, both I and the person in the conversation seem to end up taking it personally, so be forewarned everyone.

Here’s what I’ve seen:

She can prepare and read a speech, but it is what she feels, means, and lives. You will see her do what she says she will do. Beware on both sides of the aisle on that trait.

She protects the rights of the individual. The citizen, the taxpayer, the unborn downs syndrome child (by personal example.) and her daughter’s right to choose life for her unborn child, which she is proud of (despite the fact she knew there would be attempts embarrass her.)

She instills the concept of personal responsibility and sacrifice in her family as a proper parent should.

She is compassionate - everyone in Alaska is getting a $1,200 energy check to help with fuel oil costs this winter (from the dividend fund – not taxing one group to pay for another.)

She’s earned her keep. She goes with her husband commercial fishing. Ever seen the deadliest catch show? She's been there. She has gone into the land of the 10 foot Kodiak bear, and hunted 1,000 lb Moose for food for her family, truly understanding where a steak comes from, a real creature that gave up its life to feed her family, not a magic tree with plastic wrapped packages. She can accept that responsibility. The truest feminist, she’s all woman, as capable as any man, and I think more than most are ready for.

I am not a Republican lackey. I don't agree with many of their decisions over the last eight years. War in Iraq? Why? Osama's in Pakistan. Illegal Amnesty? I'm a taxpayer who's sick of that subsidy. Subsidize the legal immigrants. Oil dependence on hostile nations? We need to be self sufficient, without greasing the oil fatcats. Nuclear, solar, wind, biofuels, and yes, domestic oil and gas. But they've been wringing their hands instead of doing something about it, unlike Sarah. On that point and others, they deserve the "more of the same" perception in my book.

Sarah Palin however, is not more of the same. I'm tired of "experienced politicians" - GWB and Cheney included. We’ve had plenty of those. Sarah has outed that sort up here where she could. I’ll sum it up in one saying we use up here - "Alaska girls kick ass!" Sarah does just that. Hope you’re ready. Yes, she'll be a sidekick this time around, but look out in 2012!

Submitted by Bob Johnston on September 11, 2008 - 2:06pm.

Hi Jon,

Thank you for your interesting perspectives on your governor. Just so you know I where I am coming from: I'm an Independent who was raised in an Assemblies of God church (reportedly one of Palin's favorite churches) and graduated from their flagship theological school.

Ergo, I know well the AofG's super-ambition to "Go into all the world and preach the gospel of Jesus Christ" and "compel them (us)to come in" (to accept Jesus as our personal Savior). Consequently, I am skeptical that she would genuinely uphold separation of church and state.

Also, I'm curious . . . does she "kick ass" for integral health, that is, a healthy ecosystem? A healthy society? Healthy individuals? If so, can you give some examples?

I'm looking forward to your responses.

Yours with empathy, evidence-based understanding, freedom, integral health, and joy!

Bob

Submitted by Jon Watts on September 11, 2008 - 10:50pm.


All four, in my estimation. Of course, the establishment clause - "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...." Makes the establishment of theocratic policies (laws) quite impossible (and rightly so.) JFK was devoutly Catholic, and there was much ado about him along these lines at his time. I myself am not Christian (nor any other religion), but believe moral guidance and spiritual connection resides within most belief systems. Personally, I would resist a theocracy with the same fervor as I would a marxist government (I am also concerned - that Obama will lead us toward the latter.)

In support of my opinion relative to Sarah's religious bent, (which I agree, she does have.) I cannot remember over the last two years of her Governorship one (factual) instance, article, or commentary regarding a particular religious influence on her part(I am sure if there was any, the media would have scraped that off the bottom of the barrel by now, they seem to be at a fever pitch over her.)

Many up here are talking about "lower 48ers" coming up here in noticeable numbers, asking everyone but the mailman what dirt there is on her. We know pretty well where they're coming from. We wouldn't cover for her, there's just nothing to tell, except concocted stories from those who would see her gone from the scene. She is truly one of our hockey moms (there are people I know who knew her growing up.) You have to keep in mind, our entire state population is a fraction of most small cities in the U.S., despite the vast land and resources.

Regarding integral health - She set the personal example of having a down's syndrome child - protecting its well being, and thereby promoting this same positive choice for future mothers. There have been literally millions of beautiful children who are not with us merely because they were inconvenient or imperfect. That makes my soul sad, disintegrated. Like I felt when I walked through Dachau.

How about healthy minds? Despite rumor, she did not demand that books be banned from the Wasilla library. Some of the books on a widely circulated list were not even in print at the time. She saw to the investement of 5 billion dollars in a state savings account, including a 2.6 billion dollar Education Fund. She has said that students should be allowed to "debate both sides" of the evolution question, but she also said creationism "doesn't have to be part of the curriculum." I'm all for circumspection.

How about special needs? Contrary to the stories, Palin did not cut funding for special needs education in Alaska by 62 percent. She didn’t cut it at all. In fact, she increased funding and signed a bill that will triple per-pupil funding over three years for special needs students with high-cost requirements.

The environment - They call her record Abysmal. Bullshit. She enacted legislation to spend $250 million dollars over 5 years on renewable energy projects including solar, wind, hydroelectric and natural gas. She enacted a subcabinet group to address environmental issues, in the interest of balancing energy exploration and being as environmentally friendly as possible. She is chairperson of the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission. - “Gov. Palin has demonstrated first-class leadership on issues critical not only to Alaska, but also to the nation’s energy security,” said IOGCC Executive Director Carl Michael Smith. “Throughout her chairmanship of the IOGCC, she has shown her commitment to ensuring we maximize domestic oil and natural gas resources balanced with environmental protection in order to ensure a sound energy future – topics of great importance in the coming election.”

The geologic storage of CO2 is among the most immediate and viable strategies for mitigating the release of CO2 into the atmosphere. In 2002, the IOGCC established a Geological CO2 Sequestration Task Force, funded by the U.S. DOE and its National Energy Technology Laboratory, to examine the technical, policy and regulatory issues related to the safe and effective storage of CO2 in subsurface geological media for both enhanced oil recovery and long-term CO2 storage. In 2006, the task force began work on Phase II of the project to develop a detailed guidance document, which was completed and released in October 2007. She also created Alaska’s Petroleum Systems Integrity Office - this office provides oversight of all of Alaska’s energy related contracts as well as ensuring that oil field infrastructure is well maintained, protecting the environment and Alaska’s economic interest.

All of this in two years. Has any candidate done more?

A Healthy Society - Today Fairbanks watched as she sent her son to Iraq (just like Joe Biden), knowing his life will be on the line to help maintain stability in Iraq until it can be handed back over to the Iraqis. There is no greater gift than the life of one's child to the world.

I can go on, but I'm feeling like none of what I've written matters. She has an "R" after her name. Might as well be scarlet.

Jon

Submitted by Bob Johnston on September 12, 2008 - 12:24pm.

Hi Jon,

Thanks for your time and effort to thoughtfully answer my questions.

Relative to your statement ". . . the establishment clause - "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...." Makes the establishment of theocratic policies (laws) quite impossible (and rightly so.)," I agree that on the surface making the establishment of theocratic policies should be impossible.

I also affirm the right of every citizen to worship as he or she pleases providing they do not attempt to oppress me with their belief system.

Having said that, the religious right has been employing what former Christian Coalition executive director Ralph Reed called "stealth" strategies and tactics to return our freedom-loving country to Christianity (either not realizing or not wanting to admit it was not ever a "Christian country" in the first place).

"Building on the remnants of Robertson's Presidential campaign," says Wikipedia, "the Coalition organized former Robertson supporters and other conservative people of faith to oppose political liberalism. Eschewing the confrontational tactics of street protest learned as a College Republican, Reed projected a "softer" public face for Christian conservatism.

Here are quotations from Wikipedia (caveat emptor):

• "I want to be invisible. I do guerrilla warfare. I paint my face and travel at night. You don't know it's over until you're in a body bag." -Ralph Reed (Norfolk Virginian-Pilot, November 9, 1991)

• "It's like guerrilla warfare. If you reveal your location, all it does is allow your opponent to improve his artillery bearings. It's better to move quietly, with stealth, under cover of night. You've got two choices: You can wear cammies and shimmy along on your belly, or you can put on a red coat and stand up for everyone to see. It comes down to whether you want to be the British army in the Revolutionary War or the Viet Cong. History tells us which tactic was more effective." - Ralph Reed (Los Angeles Times, March 22, 1992)

The religious right's evangelical fervor doesn't stop with the political demise of Ralph Reed, the late Jerry Falwell in a TV special bragged about his Liberty University's Law School. He showed viewers a replica of the interior of the U.S. Supreme Court which is used to help law students visualize themselves as justices and how to comport themselves when they arrived which included interpreting the U.S. Constitution in a way toward achieving his goal of "returning" the United States to being a Christian nation. His final words were, "We will never give up!"

Further, there is evidence extreme right wing evangelicals armed with law degrees from religious broadcaster Pat Robertson's law school American Center for Law and Justice are attempting to flood the halls of congress and our legal system in general for the purpose of turning our wonderful country into a Christian theocracy.

So, I think my following question is clearly beyond being symptomatic of paranoia when I ask, "Where do you think Sarah Palin is in this mix?" It is well known that the political energy of the evangelicals has been re-energized by her appearance on the Republican ticket with John McCain. It is clear they see her as a potentially powerful ally in their cause to make our beloved country Christian, whether by overt, covert, or both means. Are they mistaken?

Yours with empathy, evidence-based understanding, integral health, and joy!

Bob

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 12, 2008 - 5:17pm.

Unencumbered
Bob,
I hear you. Still, my best friend is a modern Pentecostal, and I am nothing of the sort. If I were running for office, I would not want people deciding that I would try to control people's minds with some "New Age" sort of technique with which I would force people into the sweatlodge and heat them up until they were weak and then instill them with the beliefs of Terrance McKenna. Oh yes, and then smoke that deadly, sinful tobacco.

I am not happy with Mrs. Palin. I only hope people will judge her fairly.
Your friend,
Barbara

Submitted by Bob Johnston on September 13, 2008 - 7:33pm.

Hi Barbara,

Wish I knew at least one "modern Pentecostal", especially among my own brothers and sister (just one). I continue to be ostrasized despite all my attempts to empathize with and accept them just as they are.

Also, I am committed to treating everyone equitably including people of all political persuasions.

Yours with empathy, understanding, integral health, and joy!

Bob

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 14, 2008 - 1:44pm.

Unencumbered
Bob,
I am truly sorry about your family's behavior. They sound so incredibly severe. Most families do not ostrasize nonbelievers. Some might try to talk them to death about issues of dogma. Ostrasizng is simply not "good Christian" behavior. Are there any tenets of the Pentecostal faith that I don't know about that say people should be ostrasized?
Yours with empathy, understanding, good health, and joy,
Barbara

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 14, 2008 - 1:44pm.

Unencumbered
Bob,
I am truly sorry about your family's behavior. They sound so incredibly severe. Most families do not ostrasize nonbelievers. Some might try to talk them to death about issues of dogma. Ostrasizng is simply not "good Christian" behavior. Are there any tenets of the Pentecostal faith that I don't know about that say people should be ostrasized?
Yours with empathy, understanding, good health, and joy,
Barbara

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 14, 2008 - 1:42pm.

Unencumbered
Bob,
I am truly sorry about your family's behavior. They sound so incredibly severe. Most families do not ostrasize nonbelievers. Some might try to talk them to death about issues of dogma. Ostrasizng is simply not "good Christian" behavior. Are there any tenets of the Pentecostal faith that I don't know about that say people should be ostrasized?
Yours with empathy, understanding, good health, and joy,
Barbara

Submitted by Jon Watts on September 12, 2008 - 9:40pm.

As Ferris Buehler once said, "isms" are generally a bad thing. Dogmatic Ideology (right or left)- is in the end just a framework for exerting control over others.

I too hope that good and true hearts step forward to govern this country. We will find out who they are by their deeds, once they sit in the seat.

Mitakuye Oyasin Friends,

Jon

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 13, 2008 - 6:30pm.

Unencumbered
In the sweatlodge today, I asked the creator to make me a nuetral conduit of light with all of its colors. I prayed for wisdom and grace for the members of all parties and leaders.
Blessings,
Barbara

Submitted by Chris Lowe on September 11, 2008 - 3:26am.

I knew this one wouldn't sneak nder your radar.

How's Rick doing?

Via con dios

Chris

Submitted by Jon Watts on September 11, 2008 - 7:12am.


Thanks for asking Chris. His condition is improving so far and he's gaining a bit of weight. Thank you for helping him. I'll do a post for a general update with a links to keep up with his progress.

Hasta luego muchacho,

Jon

Submitted by John K Arnold on September 11, 2008 - 8:51pm.

First impression of Sarah Palin, scary. Why, not exactly sure but get the hit from her and from a lot of Republicans and Democrats, but not as much, that it only matters to win and gain power. Power can be a wonderful thing. We need electrical power to run stuff. My hit on her is you better not disagree with her if she has more power or pull than you.

I really dislike the I am a fighter position. I wrote Hillary and told her the same. I guess if I want to bet on a boxing match or UFC match I am looking for a fighter. There is a time for that, but I don't see it is as strength.

There is the very famous Bay of Pigs story. I was there in Florida. A fighter has only one side, fight. If John Kennedy had been more of a fighter, I don't think I would be here to write this.

The pit bull joke has been used to death. Speeches don't tell you much about the person other than their ability to deliver a speech as speech writers and strategists put it together. I have heard personally some amazing talks that if you asked me, I would have said the person was just talking. I heard Art Linkletter tell stories. He could tell them like he was doing it for the first time, everytime. It was amazing.

My college roommate has been a pipeline engineer in Alaska for over 30 years. From the little I know of Alaska from the time I talk with David, my roommate, Sarah takes a lot of credit for things that came long before her.

I doubt that anyone in their right mind would want to continue as Bush has. How do we determine who is in their right mind?

Unfornately, most of my close encounters of the republican kind, have not been very good. They have been of the sort that has been highly valued in history. History is written by the winners. In the south, it seemed to me growing up that those that won, by screwing others out of their money and property became the local celebrated heroes. Gain power any cost.

Unfortunately, we are now in a time when the middle east has immense financial power. This is simply due to oil. These are the drug cartels of our time. The dealers are our leaders, at least at the moment.

I really cringe at religion and religious beliefs being legislated. Florida does that. Unfortunately, I don't believe that either John McCain or Sarah Palin agree with the separation of state and church as that interferes with their fullfilling their God's will. Nothing is scarier than people fulfilling God's will.

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 12, 2008 - 5:30pm.

Unencumbered
My school year started with prayer in the school auditorium (teachers present, not students). I can accept prayer that is inclusive and have even learned to not let the "in Christ's name" bother me if hit with it at the end. This prayer began with Christ, a person of whom I am quite fond, but do not want in my prayers. So, I sat with eyes open, and noticed that a few others were not praying. Still, church and state were not separate. Congress begins with prayer, but I think the religions are rotated.

An inclusive prayer that perhaps even atheists could accept would be something like:
May we all experience peace.
May we all be surrounded by joy.
May our lives be filled with love and light.
May the earth and her inhabitants be healed.

The words above could be seen as prayer or wishes.

It's a very sticky business though.
~Barbara

Share This Page

User login