TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2 2008

Chris Lowe's Post

Chris Lowe's Post

Let's Rename the Planet

Chris Lowe | 09.17.08 | 04:44 PM |
0
Not yet rated
Chris Lowe's picture

I've just spent a lazy hour (when I should have been working) scanning recent economic or politically related posts and think that despite differing and divergent opinions you guys (US based) are all fiercely American and hold firm to the highest principles and potentials of your country. A love of country is common to all nationalities as is a niggling distrust of anything alien. We Aussie's love our football (Aussies Rules not the strange offense/defense battle of Waterloo game), meat pies, kangaroos (although we are probably the only nation to eat the animals which adorn our national crest) and Holden cars (we even have a song about it).

Perhaps things might be easier if we did away with a few borders and became more citizens of the world. It wouldn't solve all the problems and nor should it, afterall you need a certain amount of friction to keep things happening. The idea of Utopia in its common conception seems very bland - but maybe that's just me.

I propose we get the ball rolling by renaming Earth. How does "Humanity" sound.

Chris


Member Comments:

Submitted by Mary Jane Mohring on September 22, 2008 - 12:14pm.

I am really getting in to this name changing. Due to pollution and global warming, how about "Withering Heights"? Or, if you want a name that reflects the essence of the people who are considered to be at the top of everything on the planet, how about "Blithering Heights"?

No, we should be able to give it a name that is covered by one word.
How about "Oops"?

Love and Light
Sky Largo

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 22, 2008 - 3:35pm.

Barbara S.
Oops is it!
BS

Submitted by Glenn Logan on September 18, 2008 - 1:07am.

I knew that I should have looked elsewhere to post the reply to Jeffrey in the thread on the financial meltdown ...
I think that Gaia would be a good name, if we wish to stay planetocentric, Universe if we want to stay inclusive with only those things visible in the material world, Kosmos fo rthe next step ...
I'm not sure we're capable of naming the levels of inclusiveness that are possible?

Peace and Love
Glenn

Submitted by Chris Lowe on September 18, 2008 - 2:20am.

Glen, my friend I'm so glad you did reply to Jeffery's post. It concerns me that so many people who have exhibited such faith in the financial sector are so disadvantaged by the current situation. As to adapting or dying - for many who are reliant on retirement savings the "adapt" part of the equation may well be the less palatable if this spiral continues.

Me, I came in with bugger all, I live a rich life on not very much and I'll probably go out with bugger all - no need for dramatic adaption, just change my spots from time to time.

Thanks for your contribution to his frivolity.

Chris

Submitted by Jeffery DeCelles on September 17, 2008 - 6:50pm.

Hey, Chris
I like the rename notion, but lean toward something less anthropocentric, in the spirit of David Abram's expression: "The more-than-human world".
Something like "WeHome"?

JED

Submitted by Chris Lowe on September 18, 2008 - 3:08am.

Hi JED

Thanks for your input and kudos to you and Glen for utilising your highly evolved intellects in contemplation of this nonsense.

In the film Contact the lovely Jodie was contacted by ET's who honed in on the radio and TV signals we've been transmitting for over 100 years now, and based on the shit that passes as news and entertainment I wonder what ET thinks of us.

So renaming the planet could be part of a whole intergalactic rebranding exercise. A client of mine recently had his "Corporate DNA" done by what appear to be a bunch of money sucking bottom dwellers. Nevertheless, such an exercise could prove invaluable in establishing the planet's "Global DNA". With a properly designed logo employing the right colours and shapes, a universally acceptable name and strict art direction it would be much easier to make the right impression.

Analysis data of the demographic is very limited so we do need to be careful not to offend our intended guests when transmitting our brand. At present they may well figure that they need not concern themselves because we will inevitably end up frying our planet and oursleves out of exsitence anyway! And we can't appear too passive - afterall perhaps the last beings in our solar system to reach out were the mob who carved the "Face on Mars". Perhaps they were successful, and perhaps it didn't work out too well. Perhaps that huge freaking canyon stretching across much of the Martian surface was not brought about by erosion.

A slogan comes to mind which subject to advice from the copywriter, art director, SEO consultant, web designer, web builder, TV networks, a myriad of interest groups, the Pope, the Dalai Lama, the Archbishop of Canterbury, several Imans and Rupert Murdoch may well combine the right balance of passivity and aggression: "Come in Peace, or we'll kill you".

I think it has potential but I'm open to further discussion.

My brain hurts. Time for another brandy.

Chris

Submitted by Butterfly-Bee on September 18, 2008 - 5:25pm.

Unencumbered

I'll have a Brandy Alexander...my brain hurts, too. As far as a name goes, I vote for "Is".
B.

Share This Page

User login