THURSDAY, JANUARY 8 2009

Bob Johnston's Post

Bob Johnston's Post

My walk through the cosmos to the post office and back . . .

Bob Johnston | 10.15.08 | 07:46 AM |
5
(1 rating)
Bob Johnston's picture

Yesterday afternoon I took a walk through the cosmos to the post office. My one-mile journey over sometimes smooth, sometimes bumpy sidewalks took me through the beautiful wide maple tree-lined streets of our picturesque little rural town nestled in the Pioneer Valley of Western Mass. Conscious of my 'working hypothesis' of being totally immersed in the transparent, timeless psycho-electromagnetic-air in and around me, the Presence of our all-permeating Source -- common denominator of all cosmic dark and light -- energizing and nurturing everything -- was almost palpable.

It reminded me of what it is probably like to breathe and live somewhat analogous to a fish within an ocean. But this particular day, for some mysterious reason the reality of that analogy seemed more than usually real,

All five of my regular senses took in the colorful array of innumerable species of flowers, tall sugar maples gloriously arrayed in their brilliant orange-red foliage, the well-manicured green lawns, the ubiquitous gray-brown squirrels darting here and there, the singing of unseen birds in the tree tops, and, of course, friendly greetings exchanged with the occasional human I met along the way.

Blended with these delicious sensations, on a parasensory level I intuited the presence of the ubiquitous intelligent energy, I have come to call OmniMind, our Source, energizing each -- the flowers, the maples, the squirrels, birds, humans, and yes, ouch! the tiny black bug which just bit my arm -- within, around, above, and below me.

It is on this parasensory level of consciousness it seems to me we share our common interconnecting 'ocean' of our being, our intercommunicating cocreative omnimind-electromagnetic-airy web of all existence.

I felt more acutely aware than usual of my seamless oneness with the all-permeating invisible Presence of our Source and all the other entities -- carnate and discarnate, feminine and masculine, immature and mature -- who share It with me.

I went on to muse about bioelectromagnetism which scientists say is an aspect of all living things, including all plants and animals. As you may know, some animals have acute bioelectric sensors, and others, such as migratory birds, are believed to navigate in part by orienting with respect to the Earth's magnetic field. Also, sharks are more sensitive to local interaction in electromagnetic fields than most humans.

One bioelectromagnetic phenomenon within us humans I found especially fascinating is the brainwave. Studies by neuroscientists have shown bioelectromagnetic fluctuations of voltage between the various parts of the cerebral cortex are detectable with electroencephalo-graphy (EEG). In an intensive biofeedback workshop at the Menninger Clinic back in 1983 I remember how stunned I was to realize that when I received a telepathic 'newsflash' the EEG signal indicating theta brainwave activity was sounded, all that while I was wide awake. Previously I had thought people had to be asleep or in trance for theta to manifest.

Then I recalled that astrophysicists report their studies show electromagnetic energy pervades our entire universe. Scientists now have evidence that each living thing is an electromagnetic field interconnected with other electromagnetic fields . . . all the way from atomic particles such as quarks in cells, to us humans and other living entities such as stars and planets, all the way through the outer reaches of our universe as far as the Hubble telescope can see.

Some physicists have hypothesized the existence of a number of universes which in the aggregate could be called a 'multiverse'. Ooops! I just stumbled a bit over a hump in the sidewalk caused by the protruding root of a large tree. Thanks, tree and sidewalk, for bringing my attention back to earth, at least for a moment.

I went on to muse about my 'working hypothesis' that the probable existence of a conscious omniversal Mind which includes, is within, and encompasses the multiverse. In other words, this conscious Source Mind encloses, permeates, and 'personally' nurtures the cocreative evolution of Its-Her-His constituents -- the physical multiverse of galaxies, planets, stars, and all within It-Her-Him.

My 'working hypothesis' that our Source is personal is supported by the realization our nightly dreams appear scripted, produced, and directed by the personal representatives of our Source.

Here I am pulling magazines, bills, and junk mail out of my post office box. I put it all in my bag and begin my trek home through the cosmos. Note: This is probably a good place to interject the fact, should you be interested, I have provided a copy of this blog in larger font as an attachment.

Interesting how walking stimulates my feeling, thinking, and intuiting. It brought back a memory of a general map of consciousness I had developed while an internal organization development consultant at Honeywell in 1968. In it I had shown a series of concentric circles all nested one within the other all the way out to the cosmos. In fact I remember how one vice president affectionately gave me the nickname "Cosmic Bob" and the fun we had with that.

I thought of Arthur Koestler's conceptualization of holons and holoarchy. You probably know his view: According to an interpreter of his work in Wikipedia (caveat emptor), a holon is a system (or phenomenon) that is a whole in itself as well as a part of a larger system. Holons can be conceived as systems within systems within systems, each nested one within the other.

You probably have seen the children's toy which comes with several transparent spheres of various sizes, each nested one within the other. The thought of these various sized spheres one within the other caused me to think of holons.

Every system -- from a subatomic particle to the universe as a whole -- can be considered a holon, On a non-physical level, words, ideas, sounds, emotions—everything that can be identified as simultaneously part of something bigger than itself, yet be viewed as having parts of their own within themselves, are viewed as holons.

Since each holon is embedded within progressively larger and larger holons, each having the ability to cocreatively self-manage, intercommunicates with, is influenced by, and influences these larger wholes as well as those smaller holons nested within it. Since a holon also contains communications systems, or parts within itself, it is similarly influenced by and influences these parts. Information flows directionally between smaller and larger systems as well as in a more random (rhizomatic) manner, perhaps similar to energy running through many entangled roots beneath the surface of the earth. That picture suggests 'entangled minds' and various degrees of complexity and chaos to me.

A hierarchy of embedded holons is termed a holarchy. The holarchic model has been seen by cosmologists as an attempt to modify and modernize perceptions of natural hierarchy so I decided to take a crack at it.

As I walked briskly, sometimes lurching a bit due to the uneven sidewalk, I visualized some nested transparent four-dimensional spheres (holons) all contained within and permeated by an infinite, transparent, timeless 'ocean' of conscious intelligent energy. Some might assume it to be "God" or "Goddess" or "Goddess-God" or some equivalent, but as you now know my agnostic view is that it is more logically viewed as our Mysterious Source.

To explain that a bit more, after much deep psychospiritual wrestling, including four-plus intense years in theological schools, with deep questions about the existence of an autocratic, micromanaging, bloody sacrifice-loving, judgmental Supreme Being, more or less similar to the Judeo-Christian version, I came to the conclusion that the existence of such an erratic -- sometimes loving, sometimes violently destructive -- being could neither be proved or disproved. (If interested see my SIA blog titled " God: Great Imperceptible "Ink Blot"?" http://www.shiftinaction.com/node/4298.)

Although no one concept of a God (to date) can be proved or disproved scientifically, I as an agnostic can readily see the logic of there being a mysterious cocreative Source of all creative evolution.

Consequently,I prefer to use the 'working hypothesis' that there is a mysterious, non-theistic, timeless "Source of All" and study Its-Her-His behavior through the integral natural sciences, namely, cosmology, physics, biology, ecology, anthropology, psychology, sociology, etc.

Such a mysterious all-pervading Source of all cocreative evolution makes It-Her-Himself known in, around, above, and below Nature. I have come hypothesize our Source Mind as permeating our atmosphere as a blend psycho-plasma-electromagnetic-air.

Through various experiences of synchroncity (Jung's term for meaningful conincidences) over the years I have experienced Its-Her-His care for me personally and for others in my sphere of social life (For examples see my blog titled "Dragor Hotel Experience: Spooky Action Up Close?" http://www.shiftinaction.com/node/6688).

After reading books by the likes of cosmologist Brian Swimme, neuroscientist Candace Pert, evolutionary biologist Elisabet Sahtouris, and systems scientist Ervin Laszlo together with personal coaching from OM (my psychospiritual soul consultant), I surmised our conscious feminine and masculine Co-Source has cocreatively evolved and continues evolving everything based on their four fundamental laws of the universe which scientists say appeared soon after the primal event some call "The Big Bang" or "Great Radiance".

Those four fundamental laws are gravitation, strong nuclear, weak nuclear, and electromagnetic energy. I hypothesize that another "law" may be the most basic of all, namely, omniversal consciousness, or what I call OmniMind, The Source of All.

When I arrived home from my two-mile trip through the cosmos to and from the post office I sat down to my PC and began writing about my thoughts and drawing (MS-Pub) my ten-holon graphic as our Source channeled all that through and with me.

With all the above in mind it seemed logical to me to draw my holarchic representation of holons starting with atomic particles such as quarks and atoms near the center of my big picture of consciousness. They would be embedded in the larger holon composed of molecules, and those within holons of larger organisms on Gaia. Our earth is embedded within our ecosystem, and progressively on out through our solar system holon, then larger and larger holons of the Milky Way galaxy, encompassed by our universe and possibly, say some scientists, other universes called multiverse or omniverse. My 'working hypothesis' is that all physical holonic systems are encompassed by and permeated by OmniMind, our cocreative Source all.

In my mind's eye I envisaged drawing my cosmological big picture, all ten of those holons represented one within the other on my four-dimensional holarchical map of consciousness. While unintentioned on my part, some folks, like one fellow in my IONS 1999 conference workshop in Orlando, said my 'big picture' reminded them of concentric "cosmic eggs" nested one within the others. And it was quite appropriate to have drawn the concentric circles which represent spheres as not only of different sizes but also not quite the same because these spheres in reality are far from perfectly round or elliptical. They may, in fact, may be rather odd in shape.

Nevertheless, in the attachment to this post is a representation of my big picture, ten nested spheres of holarchic consciousness.

I suggest you remember my four disclaimers: One, whether there are ten holonic spheres or some other number is a matter of one's own subjective interpretation; Two, my computer refuses to draw holons as four-dimensional spheres, so they come out as one-dimensional concentric circles; Third, as I have portrayed them these holons are "too perfect" because in actuality holons are very irregular, more blobbish in appearance the than the more 'perfect' spheres in my map of consciousness. My computer just wouldn't consider drawing holonic blobs within holonic blobs. My fourth disclaimer is summed up in semanticist Albert Korzybski's "The map is not the territory." In other words, any map will probably portray just one of many possible portrayals, no one of which can portray the whole of what the territory actually is.

Having stated my disclaimers here is an outline of ten nested holons all enveloped within and permeated by all-pervading realm of conscious Mind of our feminine and masculine Co-Source Mind-Spirit of all holons.

Note that I use the 0 (Zero) to represent timeless It-Her-Him.

0 - Timeless Aware Mystery Feminine and Masculine Co-Source of All. Pervading all, She-He-It is the all-nurturing intelligent conscious energy which is not only the 'glue' which holds and integrates every holon with the whole system but participates cocreatively with each to achieve the evolutionary work of each holon in intercommunicating as needed with every other holon.

10 - The physical Omniverse/Multiverse holon cocreatively self-manages interdependent with our Source Mind and each holon embedded within it, including all holonic systems listed below (which show in the attached graphic as within it)

9 - Our Universe holon cocreatively self-manages interdependent with and intercommunicating with our Source Mind and each holon embedded within it, including all holonic systems listed above, around, and below.

8 - Our Milky Way Galaxy holon cocreatively self-manages interdependent with and intercommunicates with our Source Mind and each holon embedded within it, including all holonic systems listed above, around, and below.

7 - Our Solar System holon cocreatively self-manages interdependent with and intercommunicates with our Source Mind and each holon embedded within it, including all holonic systems listed above, around, and below.

6 - Our Ecosystem holon cocreatively self-manages interdependent with and intercommunicates with our Source Mind and each holon embedded within it, including all holonic systems listed above, around, and below.

5 - Our Planet Earth holon cocreatively self-manages interdependent with and intercommunicates with our Source Mind and each holon embedded within it, including all holonic systems listed above, around, and below.

4 - Our Social Culture holon cocreatively self-manages interdependent with and intercommunicates with our Source Mind and each holon embedded within it, including all holonic systems listed above, around, and below.

3 - Each Organism (including your biological body) holon cocreatively self-manages interdependent with and intercommunicates with our Source Mind and each holon embedded within it, including all holonic systems listed above, around, and below.

2 - Each Molecule holon within our biological bodies cocreatively self-manages interdependent with and intercommunicates with our Source Mind and each holon embedded within it, including all holonic systems listed above, around, and below.

1 - Each Atomic Particle/Atom holon cocreatively self-manages interdependent with and intercommunicates with our Source Mind and each holon embedded within it, including all holonic systems listed above, around, and below.

0 - Our Timeless Aware Mystery Feminine and Masculine Co-Source Mind-Spirit of All. Pervading all, She-He-It is the all-nurturing intelligent energy which is not only the 'glue' which holds and integrates every holon with the whole system but participates cocreatively with each to achieve the evolutionary work of each holon in intercommunicating as needed with every other holon.

I hypothesize our Source may well be the conscious cocreative evolver of and comprised of mind, plasma, electricity, magnetic, and air which is mainly oxygen and hydrogen. All those combined gave me one word 'psychoplasmoelectromagneticair'.

SOME ADDITIONAL NOTES
1. My 'working hypothesis' regarding each holonic system at all levels of the big picture is that each has a temporal internal system consisting of these phases: cocreative conception, birth, development, preservation, diminishing, death, recycling, and renewal through the cocreative conception of a new temporal form which journeys through the same general process described above.

2. According to my soul consultant OM there is a magna carta provided by our Source for souls who want to free themselves from the involuntarily conditioned attachments, identifications, addictions, habits, and hang-ups associated with the temporal cycle of conception, maturation, and death summed up in 1. above.

Now termed The Source Magna Carta (SMC) it is described as follows: OmniMind (OM), our Source has confided that a soul, defined as a "perfected soul," is the most beautiful. A perfected soul is one which has completely disidentified with attachments, identifications, addictions, habits, and hang-ups relative to temporal feelings, thoughts, images, behaviors, and possessions (including one's biological body).

More specifically, we may know these as beliefs, values, theories, hypotheses, attitudes, intentions, motives, processes, genders, roles, body types, behaviors, maps of consciousness, and material possessions.

Characteristically, a perfected soul is window-glass-clear in a quiescent state but exudes a beautiful silverish diaphanous quality when in action. Generally, this most beautiful and freest of souls is consciously one with our timeless Source, the Omnipresence.

It-she-he is a skillful cocreative self-manager of its-her-his conscious repertoire of all existentially available options, is integrally healthy, empathetic with all, sees each response to each situation as an option with caveats. In addition it-she-he is flexible, experimental, confident, receptive to feedback, makes effective adjustments to stay on course according to intentions. And last but not least, the perfected soul tends to make more money within healthful social and ecosystemic parameters in the temporal world.

CAVEATS: While the perfected soul viewed on a transtemporal holonic level is most beautiful, its-her-his cocreative self-management of its functioning and effectiveness in the temporal realm may be less than perfect. Every social and ecosystemic situation being different, idiosyncracies often require new empathies, insights, adjustments, and behaviors in communicating effectively with others.

Put another way, interpersonally (inter-soul-ly) there is always something new to learn, e.g. every persona is similar in some ways but different in others, mistakes are easily made. The ongoing mission of the beautiful. perfected. transtemporal soul is to learn from each situation in the temporal realm and keep on going to new relationships and learning therefrom on into the transtemporal.

There are processes for becoming a perfected soul free of temporal attachments, identifications, addictions, habits, and hang-ups. If you want you can review these optional processes at:

A Transformational Ten-Step Process to Integral Noetic Consciousness http://www.shiftinaction.com/node/5533

Cocreative Self-Management Transformation and Development System: My Ten-Step Affirmational Process http://www.shiftinaction.com/node/2075

Soul Consciousness Expansion Process: An Integral Noetic Overview http://www.shiftinaction.com/node/3923

SUGGESTED PSYCHOSPIRITUAL EXERCISE
I have used this map of consciousness I call "Ten Nested Spheres of Holon Consciousness I" as the focus for contemplation on the 'big picture'. Some fascinating experiences with it has often sent me excitedly to my encyclopedia.

Having said that I cannot guarantee results for you, however it may be a useful exercise with which to experiment for expanding your consciousness on your own terms.

Steps:
1. Place the map of consciousness titled "Ten Nested Spheres of Holon
Consciousness I " in front of you.

2. Sit quietly in a comfortable position

3. Close your eyes.

4. Deeply relax all your muscles, beginning at your feet and progressing up through your head

5. Breathe slowly and naturally as you focus on the center of the map of consciousness and repeat to yourself: 'I am a pure, transparent, timeless center of our Source of All. I am not any temporal feeling, thought, image, attitude, behavior, or possession. However, I include all temporal feelings, thoughts, images, attitudes, behaviors, and possessions in my repertoire of options, deploying each option healthfully and practically as I see fit.'

6. Assume a passive receptive attitude and open your eyes. Focusing on the center holon first, accept without judging, evaluating, or modifying all para-images, para-audibles, para-thoughts, para-touches, para-smells, and para-tastes.

Should you find yourself overwhelmed with para-data, you can say in response to each of those paranormal messages, "That's an option," or "I am pure, transparent, timeless awareness. I am not __________ (whatever the paranormal message was). That is simply an option which I choose to use or ignore as I wish" or "I visualize that para-information transforming into something healthful and useful to me."

Any one of those interventions will probably help you manage incoming psychospiritual data. If not email me at omnimind@admin.umass.edu for additional options.

Don't worry about how well you're doing. If distracted you can simply say to yourself something like "Oh well" and gently return to focusing on the holon of your choice.

If I want to remember my paranormal messages I simply write them in a journal or PC or laptop.

7. Continue for as long as you feel comfortable.

8. If you are new to this kind of process, upon finishing the exercise it may be wise to continue sitting quietly for a minute or so, allowing your other healthful regular thoughts to return.

9. Express gratitude to our Source of All for the para-data you received.

10. Move on to focusing receptively on other holons as you feel ready.

Yours with empathy, probabilistic evidence-based natural science, freedom, integral health, and joy!

Bob Johnston

P.S. If you would like to read this blog in larger print access the attachment.

Should you have difficulty accessing the attachments try this: After you have clicked on the attachment you want and when you get to the message box which gives you "Open" and "Save" options, click on "Save" -- that should get you to another message box where you can click "Open", that should give you access to the attachment you are after. If not, write to me at omnimind@admin.umass.edu and I'll send the documents via email. Bob

REFERENCES
Assagioli, Roberto (1965). PSYCHOSYNTHESIS. New York: Putnam Press.

Johnston, Robert Wayne (1979). THE INTEGRAL LEADER-MANAGER PROCESS WORKBOOK. L.A.: Western Gear (currently updating)

___________________ (1999). Ten Spheres-Plus of Integral Noetic Consciousness Transformation and Wisdom, Workshop presented to the IONS International Conference, Orlando, FL.

Jung, Carl G.(1968). PSYCHOLOGY AND ALCHEMY. Bollingen Series XX. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Koestler, Arthur (1967). THE GHOST IN THE MACHINE. London: Hutchinson (1990 reprint edition Penguin Group)

Korzybski, Alfred (1990). COLLECTED WRITINGS 1920-1950, Institute of General Semantics, 1990, hardcover

Pert, Candace B. (1997). MOLECULES OF EMOTION. New York: Scribner

Sahtouris, Elisabet (2004). EARTHDANCE -- Living Systems in Evolution. NY: iUniversity Press

Laszlo, Ervin (2004). SCIENCE AND AKASHIC FIELD – An Integral Theory of Everything. NY: Inner Traditions

__________ (2008). QUANTUM SHIFT IN THE GLOBAL BRAIN. NY: Inner Traditions

Swimme, Brian and Berry, Thomas (1992). THE UNIVERSE STORY. San Francisco: Harper Collins

Unknown author (2008). HOLONS. Wikipedia website..

©Copyright 1968; Rev. 1998, 2008 - Robert Wayne Johnston - OmniMind Constituents . . . for integral self, social, and ecosystem health and wellbeing


Member Comments:

Submitted by Mary Jane Mohring on October 18, 2008 - 9:46am.

I received it clear and strong. It is amazing at the strength of this particular concept. Thank you for all the time you took to provide access for my limited computer knowledge. I have worked on the perfecting and explanation of my concept and it has involved colors and explanations. It has involved numbers and eventually it all came together. I am doing the fine tuning and it has been a joy to see it take life. Your concept seems to be in the shapes of the ellipsis, what prompted the design? Does it have any root logic? I am locked into circles and spheres. Have you had any pull toward colors? Have you had any pull toward refracting the concept with further explanations? My concept deals with Spirit. Love to hear your input.

Love and Light
As always,
Jane

Submitted by Bob Johnston on October 18, 2008 - 11:26am.

Hi Jane, glad my materials got to you okay.

You asked, "Your concept seems to be in the shapes of the ellipsis, what prompted the design? Does it have any root logic?" The shapes of the ellipsis, as I explained in my original blog, is misleading. If shown more accurately each "ellipse" would look more like an amorphous blob. My graphic portrays them as ellipsis because my computer refuses to draw blobs : - ( .

What prompted the design of my ten spheres is a long history in systems design, starting in the late 1950s when as an engineering psychologist I was involved at Lockheed Space Systems in human-machine systems design. My interest grew from there to what you see today represented in my graphics.

Yes, it does have a root logic. Rather than recreate it all I am taking the lazy man's way out and presenting an overview of systems thinking I adapted from Wikipedia as follows.

AN OVERVIEW OF SYSTEMS THEORY
System (from Latin systēma, in turn from Greek σύστημα systēma) is a set of interacting or interdependent entities, real or abstract, forming an integrated whole.

The concept of an "integrated whole" can also be stated in terms of a system embodying a set of relationships which are differentiated from relationships of the set to other elements, and from relationships between an element of the set and elements not a part of the relational regime.

OVERVIEW
The scientific research field which is engaged in the transdisciplinary study of universal system-based properties of the world is general systems theory, systems science and recently systemics. They investigate the abstract properties of the matter and mind, their organization, searching concepts and principles which are independent of the specific domain, independent of their substance, type, or spatial or temporal scales of existence.

The term system has multiple meanings
1. A collection of organized things; as, a solar system.
2. A way of organizing or planning.
3. A whole composed of relationships among the members.

Most systems share the same common characteristics. These common characteristics include the following:
1. Systems have a structure that is defined by its parts and processes.
2. Systems are generalizations of reality.
3. Systems tend to function in the same way. This involves the inputs and outputs of material (energy and/or matter) that is then processed causing it to change in some way.
4. The various parts of a system have functional as well as structural relationships between each other.
The characteristics of systems have been studied in general systems theory.

HISTORY
The term System has a long history which can be traced back to the Greek language.

In the 19th century the first to develop the concept of a "system" in the natural sciences was the French physicist Sadi Carnot who studied thermodynamics. In 1824 he studied what he called the working substance (system), i.e. typically a body of water vapor, in steam engines, in regards to the system's ability to do work when heat is applied to it. The working substance could be put in contact with either a heat reservoir (a boiler), a cold reservoir (a stream of cold water), or a piston (to which the working body could do work by pushing on it). In 1850, the German physicist Rudolf Clausius generalized this picture to include the concept of the surroundings and began to use the term "working body" when referring to the system.
In the 1980s the term complex adaptive system was coined at the interdisciplinary Santa Fe Institute by John H. Holland, Murray Gell-Mann and others.

SYSTEMS CONCEPTS
Environment and boundaries

Systems theory views the world as a complex system of interconnected parts. We scope a system by defining its boundary; this means choosing which entities are inside the system and which are outside - part of the environment. We then make simplified representations (models) of the system in order to understand it and to predict or impact its future behavior. These models may define the structure and/or the behaviour of the system.

Natural and man-made systems
There are natural and man-made (designed) systems. Natural systems may not have an apparent objective but their outputs can be interpreted as purposes. Man-made systems are made with purposes that are achieved by the delivery of outputs. Their parts must be related; they must be “designed to work as a coherent entity” - else they would be two or more distinct systems.

Open system
An open system usually interacts with some entities in their environment. A closed system is isolated from its environment.
Process and transformation process.

A system can also be viewed as a bounded transformation process, that is, a process or collection of processes that transforms inputs into outputs. Inputs are consumed; outputs are produced. The concept of input and output here is very broad. E.g. An output of a passenger ship is the movement of people from departure to destination.
Subsystem.

A subsystem is a set of elements, which is a system itself, and a part of a larger system.

REFERENCES
1. ^ Wiktionary:system
2. ^ [Michael Pidwirny], Definitions of Systems and Models, 1999-2007.
3. ^ Steiss 1967, p.8-18.
4. ^ Bailey, 1994.
5. ^ Buckley, 1967.
6. ^ Banathy, 1997.
7. ^ Klir 1969, pp. 69-72
8. ^ Checkland 1997; Flood 1999.
9. ^ Adam Maria Gadomski, Modeling of socio-cognitive vulnerability - TOGA meta-theory approach *, International Workshop on Complex Network and Infrastructure Protection, CNIP2006, Rome

FURTHER READING
• Alexander Backlund (2000). "The definition of system". In: Kybernetes Vol. 29 nr. 4, pp. 444-451.

• Kenneth D. Bailey (1994). Sociology and the New Systems Theory: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis. New York: State of New York Press.

• Bela H. Banathy (1997). "A Taste of Systemics", ISSS The Primer Project.

• Walter F. Buckley 91967). Sociology and Modern Systems Theory, New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

• Peter Checkland (1997). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

• Robert L. Flood (1999). Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning within the unknowable. London: Routledge.

• George J. Klir (1969). Approach to General Systems Theory, 1969.

Back now to your comments, Jane, you stated " I am locked into circles and spheres. Have you had any pull toward colors?" I have but colors (vibrations) are a bit too far out for my feeble brain to wrap itself around right now.

Have you had any pull toward refracting the concept with further explanations? My concept deals with Spirit. Oh yes, I use the terms OmniMind, Mystery Source, Psycho-plasmo-electromagnetic-air interchangeably with TIMELESS ALL-PERVADING SPIRIT and the term emotion interchangeably with human spirit.

What are your feelings and thoughts?

With empathy, understanding, probabilistic science/intuition-based evidence, freedom, integral health, and the joy of our Source!

Bob

Submitted by Mary Jane Mohring on October 18, 2008 - 2:34pm.

We are supposed to be in the "time" of information. I am not sure whether I believe that the flash-points of information are getting stronger, or if the human mind is now becoming extremely sensitive to new concepts. The "brain" has developed sophisticated pathways. The mind has relaxed into processing more complicated equations. The human spirit is now getting "in touch" with all it knows. The combination is breaking down old barriers and opening up new vistas. If we accept that we "can" know, we "will" know. Looking forward to what is coming. I love your concept. Love and Light
As always,
Jane

Submitted by Glenn Logan on October 17, 2008 - 6:15am.

Today, I looked at the ten levels of holons you present, Bob. I like it, as there are at least this many when we look at sheer volume/size. In this vein, I have kept my concepts in an even fuzzier hierarchy of blobs: Microscopic, or too small to see with the naked eye; Real, or viewable; and Macroscopic, or too big to comprehend with our five senses.
The hierarchy with which I most often concern myself is in levels of abstraction (really too 'coarse' a term). The human brain might serve as a guide to the lower levels:
The reptilian brain is concerned only with survival, the 'four f's' of need (fight, flight, food, and f... er, procreate).
The midbrain is able to learn complex tasks and function at the level of the group, tribe or society. It enables love and other 'higher' emotions.
The cortex (as we understand it now) enables abstract reasoning and, I think, basic spirituality.
In terms of AllThatIs, or collective consciousness, it seems that the cortex is part of a larger, more etherial network that allows higher levels of spirit to function.
But then, as Annie Besant warned in 1888 in her book 'The Ancient Wisdom", we can comprehend the levels below us, we can have limited knowledge of the level we have attained (and can spend a lifetime exploring this level), and we can be dimly aware of the level to which we aspire. The only knowledge of levels above us is from hearsay, the testimony of those who, like Jesus, Muhammad, Gautama Buddha and others, have voluntarily returned to act as Teachers.

I glanced at the section following the one on holons, and this appears to be similar to what I teach in my Psych classes and therapy groups, so I'll not comment there. But thanks, again.

Peace and Love
Glenn

Submitted by Bob Johnston on October 17, 2008 - 10:37am.

. . . for your kind words and insights, Glenn. Warm regards, Bob

Submitted by Glenn Logan on October 16, 2008 - 12:52am.

Bob, wonderful piece and I hope someday to be able to read it all. Being blind does limit my physical ability to stay with long posts, and it also affects my ability to hold more than a couple of concepts in mind at one time ... Disclaimer completed, now:
MJ speaks to the circles within circles, and I note that you reference the idea of spheres within spheres. I use the old Hindu/Theosophist concept of planes, roughly analogous to degrees of abstraction or material substance, or etherealism. Within these planes are levels of knowledge ('knowing', rather than didactic) within which we progress to fulfill our Karma of morphing into the 'next' plane.
All of this, of course, fits in well with Wilber's explication of holons within the X, Y and Z axes of the sphere, adding an omega axis for the 'next' dimension and all the time bearing in mind the concept of time being a dimension of sorts.
For many years, I kept a dessicated orange with the axes recognized by solid geometry drawn upon it, so that I could visualize moving out from center on a vector, then making a turn at a 'fuzzy/funny angle' to access the next plane.
Then, of course, comes the idea of immanence I learned from theological sources: The One with no Two interpenetrates every level of existence, which in turn interpenetrates the One. Indra's Web is a kinda graphic representation of this idea.
Wal, I chewed that thar bone a bit ... maybe I'll get to some of the other ideas you present, in time?
Thanks again.
Peace and Love
Glenn

Submitted by Bob Johnston on October 16, 2008 - 5:48am.

Hi Glenn ~ Thank you for your kind words and integrative feedback.

Once you mentioned your limited vision et al I realized I was remiss in not following an earlier intuition to the effect that I should interject my post script earlier in the body of my blog so readers like you could have seen it. My apologies.

My P.S. advises readers my blog is available in larger font in one of the attachments. Maybe that will help facilitate your reading of the rest of the blog.

I'm looking forward to whatever, if any, additional feedback you may have for me.

Yours with empathy, understanding, freedom, integral health, and joy!

Bob

Submitted by Glenn Logan on October 17, 2008 - 5:45am.

Print size is not a problem for me, and I assume most folks with vision imapairment have something to help: I use a combination of Zoom Text, a proprietary program that will also read text out loud, and WebEyes, a freeware program that not only enlarges the text but reformats it so that it will fit the width of the screen, in whatever magnification (this obviates the need to scroll laterally).
My peculiar problem is physical fatigue, as what I read is done by 'elliptical viewing', that takes at least four eye movements to read an increment of text (an increment may be only one or two words, in material that takes careful reading to get the gist, or it could be five or six words - and this process produces frustration, as my reading pattern was formerly at least half a page at a time, with total recall and nearly total comprehension).
Using your post as a rule of thumb, it comprises at least as much printed material as I'm able to read in a day.
My pattern of knowledge integration is visual and kinetic, and I've never learned to do well with aural input (besides being stone deaf in one ear and severely impaired in the other, both with nerve damage that impedes the ability to decode speech).
I thought to learn Braille, but I have peripheral neuropathy and cannot feel the pattern of dots.
I do pretty well with taste and smell memory, but do not know of any mainstream ways of imparting knowledge via these media.
The upshot is that I'm somewhat resigned to perusing a limited number of new concepts in greater depth than before my vidion impairment became a major impediment to learning.
Some things, for anyone wishing to communicate to those with vision impairmant: Keep the type font simple (italics are near impossible to read, Arial is best for me personally); and provide maximum contrast (black on white or light blue is sharpest, while colored print is almost unreadable and white on black produces a feeling akin to a flashlight shining directly into my eyes).
Thanks for the opportunity to pass on some stuff, Bob

Peace and Love
Glenn

Submitted by Bob Johnston on October 18, 2008 - 6:11am.

Thank you, Glenn, for clarifying your challenges. I marvel at how well you do in adapting and responding to them.

Yours with empathy and understanding (to the degree I can as one not having similar challenges),

Bob

Submitted by Bob Johnston on October 16, 2008 - 6:22am.

Hi again, Glenn ~ I interjected a note to readers who may be interested in reading my blog in larger font in the attachment at the point in my narrative when I was in the post office and ready to walk back home. I would have inserted it earlier but didn't want to break up the flow of my story. Thanks again for the idea. Bob

Submitted by Mary Jane Mohring on October 15, 2008 - 8:30am.

Some of the greatest scientists have come to the conclusion that there is a Highest Power. I certainly don't understand it but I concur. Man always tries to give this energy a name and then it must be put in a box with a name and then these names and perceptions are what man fights about. I am like you Bob, I know it exists, but I enjoy the mystery of Source functioning as the "Unfathomable". I had this "connecting" experience in 1984. A total concept of circles within circles presented itself and this year I am having the joy of putting it forth on my website. It reminds me of "Ezekiel saw the wheels, way up in the middle of the sky."

Our concepts both involve circles within circles. I am enjoying my feeling of awareness not for the sake of ego but for the feeling of total wholeness and purpose. I believe that the Matrix form is boundless but the micro form or exact copy is within the quantum field within each expression of reality. (I explain it on my website) It gives me such peace. It is interesting to watch each of us search until we are able to reach the peaceful knowing of feeling that we are in touch with what we have been searching for. Each person is different in the questions that we have asked of the "Eternal Infinite" so we are all finding exquisite joy in the uniqueness if our individual answers.

Beautiful blog.

Love and Light,
As always,
Jane

Submitted by Bob Johnston on October 15, 2008 - 3:47pm.

Jane, I appreciate your empathetic words. With empathy, understanding, freedom, health, and joy! Bob

Submitted by Bob Johnston on October 16, 2008 - 8:29am.

Jane, I hope I didn't somehow mislead you. Glenn is correct in that my intention was to portray ten transparent four-dimensional spheres all nested one within the other rather than the one-dimensional circles to which you referred. I can see why you interpreted my graphic as a series of circles but that, as I tried to explain in my blog, is attributable to my software which simply refused to draw four-dimensional spheres. My PC and I apologize for misleading you :-)
Warmly, Bob

Submitted by Mary Jane Mohring on October 16, 2008 - 10:56am.

I was relating to the concepts that seem to be coming forth and the idea of spheres or circles. I have spheres in my concept also, and they are referred to as Echelons. They are representative of Spiritual Dimensions and there are ten with a binary mode that gives the possibility of eleven. The thrilling aspect is the matter of concepts now becoming equations and put in to form that can be at least considered.

Isn't life a wonderful walk?

Love and Light
As always,
Jane

Submitted by Bob Johnston on October 17, 2008 - 10:27am.

Thanks, Jane, for your sharing and feedback. Warmly, Bob

Submitted by Mary Jane Mohring on October 17, 2008 - 12:17pm.

I am not able to pull up your attachments. I called in the reserves and my husband tried. We downloaded your attachments six times but were unable to get it to function. I want to look at your new presentation but I am learning first hand how it feels to want (kidding but not kidding). I have to only imagine the concept so I will continue to read the comments for the feedback. If you have any technical advice I will be glad to get it.

Love and Light
As always'
Jane

Submitted by Bob Johnston on October 17, 2008 - 6:46pm.

Mary Jane, sorry you're having difficulty. Let's try this: When you get to the message box which gives you "Open" and "Save" options, click on "Save" -- that should get you to another message box where you can click "Open", that should give you access. If not, send your email address and I'll send the docs that way. Best wishes, Bob

Submitted by Mary Jane Mohring on October 17, 2008 - 8:14pm.

I will sure give a try to all of the above.
Love and Light.
As always,
Jane

Share This Page

User login